I assume they do what the machine does and check the balance first. Som= ething weird happens with our machines, I think they take =A3100 from yo= ur card when you insert it, then refund what you don't use out of that w= hen you've finished. You don't have to reinsert the card. Presumably i= f you only had =A340 in the card, it would stop pumping at =A340. I've = never had a card with under =A3100 in it, and I've never tried to take m= ore than =A3100 of petrol, so I don't know what it does.
That's wrong when the card has only $30 available and you don't want to have to fart around when you manage to end up putting $30.02 of petrol in the car. With the pumps that allow you to put the card in the pump, that will see the payment fail and you have to fart around getting that manually overridden, if that is actually possible.
And anyway, when the pump does allow your to specify the dollar amount to be supplied, might as well use that feature instead of trying to ensure that you don't go over what what is available on the card.
More convenient for him to tell the pump to supply $10 and just plonk the $10 on the counter and walk out.
It isnt pointless when you have to fart around after you have managed to pump a little more than the card has on it into your tank.
Much more convenient to tell the pump how much to supply.
It's a lot more than a few cents. And it isnt just for the interest, its also much more convenient to have it always completely automatic.
Not possible when you don't know how much will be pumped. It can't check that the maximum possible to be pumped can be paid for because plenty will just pump what they can pay for.
Wouldn't be hard to test if you have more than one card and only a stupid has only one card.
Did that a lot more than half a century ago now, and arent actually stupid enough to keep doing it now, or actually stupid enough to shave my legs either.
Renting isn't necessarily more expensive when you factor in the mortgage, taxes, and upkeep on your 'investment'. I've lived in at least two apartments and a rental house where I made modifications. In one case the landlord footed the bill for materials.
Finally, if you live in an RV you get to keep it. And modify it. Lot rent is quite a bit less than rental properties.
Living in a tent isn't bad. I lived in my pickup for much of 1988 and
1989. Technically I suppose I was homeless but it was my choice. Home was anyplace in the US where I parked it.
A beard is better than the 'I shaved three days ago' style adopted by the millenials. I'm not sure how they maintain the appearance but it must be more work than either shaving or not.
Maybe they just can't grow more than that? Tell them they have bumfluff, that'll annoy them. Incase that doesn't mean anything over there, it's what the British say about a young male who can't yet grow a proper moustache.
If you don't plan on selling it who cares? Besides, as you argued for automobiles, buy them used after they depreciate.
When I left NH if it didn't fit in the pickup I didn't need it. Right now I've been stationary too long and the shit is accumulating. MP3s and Kindles are great inventions; electrons take up a lot less room than books, tapes, and CDs.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.