Pure zinc
Pure zinc
load it with mica as a filler, or similar
Presumably the mineral additive is the retardant, the A2 versions (of other cladding products) seem to be pure mineral.
Many polymers (plastics) contain mineral fillers to modify their mechanical and other properties. Fillers such as talc, kaolin, chalk (whiting), titania, gibbsite, mica etc. are widely used. They can also increase the fire resistance of the polymer. Minerals that decompose on modest heating, liberating water vapour or CO2, are best for fire retarding, but even inert fillers reduce the tendency to burn simply by a dilution effect.
See e.g.
Ah we obviously had the wrong type of fire breaking out. I'll have a word with God if he exists if I were him. In denial springs to mind Seems the same sort of denial mechanism we often here when aircraft crashes are down to what are termed freak coincidences. Or like both Shuttle losses where as Dear old Peter Sellars put it so succinctly in his party political speech. I do not consider existing conditions, likely. Brian
ITYF that the answer to this question is "Yes" - that's why the are all failing
tim
In message , at 11:54:11 on Fri, 30 Jun
2017, tim... remarked:
Where will I "find" evidence of this?
Or the original method of testing was flawed.
AIUI the original fire testing did not penetrate the metal coating, whereas at Grenfell the fire melted the coating, enabling the core to behave like a firelighter. Thus we know relying on the metal face to stop fire does not work, the material behind it has to be non-flammable in future. Anything l ess will only add a big stack of fuel to a fire.
NT
Wasn't that when the armchair experts here were claiming a saving of £5k or so was involved? £300k is rather more significant.
Where's he complaining about them? Explaining their limitations is hardly complaining.
I don't think anyone here actually came up with the figure of £5k, just reported that "someone else" had said that it was £2/sheet cheaper and had arrived at the figure.
Pure zinc. Not uncommon as a cheaper alternative to lead these days.
PE as a binder mixed with an inert foamed mineral like alumina or silica. Much less amenable to burning and less fuel when it does.
Zinc melts at a lower temperature than aluminium so if it had been zinc and pure PE core then the resulting fire might well have been worse.
On buildings higher than 18m A2 rated cladding is the sort of stuff they probably should have been using if they wanted it not to be vulnerable to fire (I notice that >18m seems to be appearing everywhere now).
I'm not sure that burning is the relevant parameter here. Zinc has a lower melting point that aluminium (419.5C cf. 660.3C), so as MB mentioned earlier in this thread, the zinc might have melted and exposed the cladding core at a lower temperature than ally.
Reading what's available on the net about aluminium in fires, it generally says that aluminium melts long before it starts to burn. See for example
OTOH when it does start to burn, it liberates an awful lot of heat, viz. the thermite process
Zinc 'burns' when it starts to boil at 907C.
How all that impinges on the Grenfell fire, and whether the burning of HMS Sheffield is relevant, as has been mentioned elsewhere, I'm not sure.
Its a panel, its flat, its painted what's going to look different?
Thats the difference between the original zinc panels and the alu panels. It was suggested that the FR variant of the alu panels was only £5k. So they could have saved ~£290k and had some fire resistance.
just listening to the people discussing it on TV has led me to that conclusion
of course, this could have been misreporting (or my misunderstanding)
I doubt that the answer is secret, just finding someone that you know (who knows someone) who's involved in the process will probably get you the answer
you probably have better contacts than most of us
tim
ITYM "safer" alternative
tim
The planning dept was probably more interested in the change from champagne finish to silver/grey finish, plus the lack of contrast from the new grey to another section that was already a different grey, so had to also be changed to maintain a higher contrast ... the zinc->alu change was approved as part of that.
Well that's the thing. I'm trying to understand whether, once the fire got going on the outside, the zinc would burn more easily than the ally, and to worse effect.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.