British holidaymakers 'traumatised' after arrest at US border (2025 Update)

Oct 15, 2019 Last reply: 8 months ago 29 Replies

A British couple say they have been detained in the US after accidentally crossing the border from Canada.



David Connors, 30, and his wife Eileen, 24, say they are being held in Pennsylvania with their three-month-old baby and are "traumatised".



They say were driving with relatives on 3 October when, to avoid an animal, they veered onto a small road.



A police officer then pulled them over, told them they were in the US state of Washington and arrested them.



The family's attorney, Bridget Cambria, of Aldea - the People's Justice Center, said the couple were driving south of Vancouver on 3 October when they took a detour to avoid an animal on the road.



The family say they did not realise they had strayed over the US border.



They were stopped by a police officer who did not read them their rights, nor allow them to "simply turn around" and go back to Canada, according to the complaint.



At first the young family say they were separated - with David Connors being held in a male-only cell, and Eileen Connors and their infant son in a women's cell.



Later, the husband was taken to a detention centre in Tacoma, Washington, while his wife and their baby son were taken to a budget hotel near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, according to the complaint.



The following morning they say they were driven to the airport, which raised their hopes that they were being flown back to Canada or the UK.



"But that was not the case," Eileen Connors says in the sworn statement. Instead, they were flown to Pennsylvania - on the other side of the country.


formatting link
Is this typical of how the US treats this sort of situation. It all seems way over the top.


Haven't you Luddites ever heard of a GPS?

Anyway, I'm sure the US authorities will return your "traumatized" snowflakes unharmed.

Sounds to me like cause for a congressional investigation by Nancy and Schiff. Trump must be involved some how.

The "veered to avoid animal" story seems bullshit to me.  Where exactly did this "accidental" border crossing take place?  Please link to the location on google maps.

...

Well, what happened to the relatives??? How far did they drive into US on this road before were stopped?

I suspect this is not the full set of facts behind the situation...as another said, one doesn't "veer" onto another entirely different simply road to avoid an elk or moose...

Nothing surprises me anymore (check out the story of only 1% able to redeem student loan forgiveness after 10 years) because Stumpie doesn't have to issue stupid orders himself. He's managed to hire a bunch of hateful people who disagree with the mission of the very agencies they get to head. Betzy DeVos; the head of the EPA iirc; and others

However, I'm one of the few people who just take any road that looks good to me. I figure 80, 90, maybe 99% try to stick to the road they are on tthat they know goes where they are going**, and if they saw an animla on the road, they'd just wait until it left. What kind of animal was it? Didn't it have to be somewhere. There's nothing to eat on the road, and no normal animal would sleep on the road***

I'd like to know the rest of this story.

**OTOH, maybe phone or rentacar navigation has made some moderately bold people into bolder ones. ***What time of day was it? Was there no sign at the actual border? I've often thought that if I couldn't get into the US legally, going to Canada and walking 2 miles into the woods, then crossing the border and walking to a road 4 miles from the border would be a good way to get in, but I don't know if that would work. And I don't think I'd take the whole family.

formatting link
Google has a lot of hits, but they seem to all say the same thing, or at least from the same pov but with more details, as is usually the case.

Run the url above in a couple days and see if you can get more info.

The problem with Stumpie is that the benefit of the doubt used to go to the federal govt. even though of course they sometimes did someething wrong, or even terrible. Now I think the benefit of the doubt goes against it.

Speaking as a Canadian - yes, this is how the US operates it's border with Canada. No different than if it was a border with North Korea.

But in this case, a border crossing road like that should have been well marked with signs, and I understand that they should have a small booth, like a telephone booth, that you're supposed to stop at and have a voice or video call with a US customs agent.

I've searched around the net for more reports of this particular story, and none of them so far have reported where this couple is now or how this situation ended.

Actually, one will 'veer' pretty much in any direction to avoid a moose.

However, I must agree with your points about the other people and how far they drove down the side road. Most people would prudently stop and back out immediately due to uncertainty about deep mud & puncture hazards.

The whole story does sound a bit suspicious. I would like to know what the police found in everyone's 'afternoon' kit bags.

Also, it is not clear if the police were waiting down the side road or following them on the highway. If the latter, they should have seen the animal.

And I would advise *anyone* that road entrances such as described are probably covered 24/7 by one or more BPS IR HD streaming video devices.

I can see an error while meandering around the back roads, but there seems to be something missing here. No sign on the road at the border? Seems they should have just been turned around and sent back. What about the relatives there were with? If they carried their passports they could have legally entered.

formatting link
According to that there were seven total, including Connors brother, and unidentified woman, and a pair of two year old twins. I smell a rat or two in their story.

I think the BBC is the US equivalent of the Concocted News Network

Same with Canada's CBC.

I've not heard this story broadcast (at least on radio) or talked about by our various am-radio morning shows.

They are talking about the Houston police shooting, by the way. Lots of it, even though we're a week away from a national election.

Giving away money doesn't work. It just breeds more useless stupid lazy welfare people.

However, there's nothing stopping you from paying off some kid's student loans. Find a needy college kid and write them a big fat check. We know you're good for it.

You must understand, the US has some bad history with the Brits. The Brits used to tax the hell out of our productive people. As a result of the oppressive taxation in the past, we're a bit on edge now so you'll have to pardon our hospitality.

[snip]

[snip]

Someone who's never had that happen says you're supposed to tell the animal to wait while you check your GPS to determine what roads it's safe to veer onto.

[snip]

"Concocted News" is much like synthetic heroin. It WILL exist as long as there are too many addicts and too little of the real thing.

In many places it IS possible to cross the international border between Canada and the USA without knowing it. It is the "longest undefended boarder in the world"

This was not the first time someone "accidentally" crossed the border near Blaine WA, and was detained for weeks.

Jogger visiting Canada from France

formatting link

Yeah, but the area around Blaine isn't one of them. Here's an alternative:

formatting link
I'm not sure how my grandmother wound up on this side of the river or if she has appropriate documentation. Things were different at the end of the 19th century. According to family anecdotes my father had some idea of how booze found its way to upstate NY during Prohibition too.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required