:>> :>>> Most of them still consider that its fine to stone people to death :>> :>>> for adultery, and crap on about the standard of proof required.
:>> :>> Well, that's nonsense. It's true that Leviticus, in addition :>> :>> to the dietary restrictions, prescribes death by stoning for :>> :>> a variety of offenses. But it's obviously untrue that most :>> :>> contemporary observers of kosher laws advocate stoning.
:>> :>You'll find that the rabid who maintain that the kosher laws :>> :>should be strictly observed today also maintain that all of :>> :>Leviticus is still applicable today, and when you pin them to :>> :>the wall on stuff like stoning adulterers to death, weasel :>> :>desperately on the standard of proof required.
:>> False.
:>Nope.
Try meeting some religious Jews.
Though I would suggest removing the swastika and hood-and-sheet first. You will find that they are a turn off to those not in your KKKlan.
:>> The standard for proof has always been great.
:>Never said it wasnt. Thats just what they weasel on when you pin :>them to the wall on continuing to adhere to Leviticus in modern times.
What is this "weaseling" that you refer to?
To repeat: The standard for proof has always been great.
:>> There is a Talmudic statement that a court that executes more :>> than one person in seventy years was considered a "hanging court".
:>Doesnt mean that there was never capital punishment used.
Nobody is disputing that.
Your argument is that the lack of executions means that the law is no longer applicable.
I have absolutely refuted your KKKlan based claim.
:>> Several great sages of 2k+ years ago stated that there would :>> never be capital conviction in one of their courts because they :>> could always show that some element of proof was missing.
:>And quite a few ended up dead anyway.
Define "quite a few".
Provide sources to support it.
Be aware that neo-nazi site proofs are rarely useful.
:>> The Jewish court had the obligation to attempt :>> to get the defendant off in a capital case.
:>And quite a few ended up dead anyway.
Define "quite a few".
Provide sources to support it.
Be aware that neo-nazi site proofs are rarely useful.
:>> :>Find a rabbi who believes in strict adherence to kosher laws, :>> :>and get him to explain why the other stuff in Leviticus no longer :>> :>applys, and the desperate attempt to bullshit his way out of :>> :>his predicament on that will stand out like dogs balls.
:>> No such thing.
:>> They are all applicable.
:>Thanks for agreeing with what I originally said.
:>Like I said, the most rabid maintain that everything :>in Leviticus still applys today, even stoning to death.
All religious Jews.
Of course, to scum like you any and all excuse is valid to murder Jews.
:>> And, unlike you, I post under my own name
:>I do too. You can wipe that egg off your face now.
Bullsh*t.
:>> and publicly provide my address and phone number.
:>Mine is available to anyone with a clue too.
Not publicly provided.
Why not try getting out from under the hood and publicly provide the information?
Afraid that someone might want to meet you, coward?
:>> What is your excuse for not doing the same?
:>Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
Why not try getting out from under the hood and publicly provide the information?
Afraid that someone might want to meet you, coward?
:>> You can now return to reading your favorite white power site.
:>Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys.
Why not try getting out from under the hood and publicly provide the information?
Afraid that someone might want to meet you, coward?