Ot: Or not. tower fire...

Jun 14, 2017 417 Replies
Saved reading

Yes, friends of ours moved from Manchester to Corwall at the time Beko fridge-freezers came to prominence. Within a couple of months their FF caused the house to be gutted, destroyed all their possessions and killed their dog - luckily they were all okay.

SteveW

Thankfully, you lose :-P

An employee of a fire and rescue authority who is authorised in writing by the authority for the purposes of this section may do anything he reasonably believes to be necessary

if he reasonably believes a fire to have broken out or to be about to break out, for the purpose of extinguishing or preventing the fire or protecting life or property;

In particular, an employee of a fire and rescue authority who is authorised as mentioned in subsection (1) may under that subsection

move or break into a vehicle without the consent of its owner;

Ah, thought the post didn't sound quite right. TM certainly does pick 'em, though!

Nothing, and it's been there over a year!

If it survives in HOH etc., perhaps it serves some purpose in informing or pissing off.

Have you sent them a bill yet?

Owain

In article , snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.co.uk writes

Not funny.

In article , Mike Tomlinson writes

Who is -the local council who owned the block?

I believe ground floor flats are *not* popular due to their vulnerability to even quite young troublemakers. The optimum seems to be first floor with at least two escape routes/entrances, the fire escape only being accessible from above.

There was a bit of Video of a housing block fire in France where the cladding carried the fire up the building VERY fast, it was on the BBC news earlier.

In article , Mike Tomlinson scribeth thus

I think its called Reynobond the one used there..

formatting link

Nothing is foolproof. Welcome to life.

NT

That would make it not criminal, but doesn't remove liability.

NT

That doesn't cut it. What's needed is a law that permits a) a vehicle to be damaged (eg rammed out the way) b) no liability for doing it. Until those are there, almost no firefighter wold want to bankrupt themselves to save lives by doing this.

NT

How about this for a possible solution? A sign on the access road saying: CRUSH ZONE You may park here for 20 minutes max If emergency access is required your vehicle may be damaged or destroyed without recompense.

Then all you need is a ramming fire truck. People can park there if they want, and they know the price.

NT

Why? It would be better if everything had been done correctly.

Like the BBC reporters talking about "The Poor" in relation to the victims.

is that not what social housing was originally for ? ....

Kensington & chelsea I think

formatting link

And is the TMO in essence just a department of the council, an arms-length subsidiary, or fully independent?

That was used on another tower block that had a spreading fire. The information released on this one is that the cladding is two sheets of aluminium with a polyethylene core. This has been linked to fires in other parts of the world.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required