Me too.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
Ot: Or not. tower fire...
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
what was he doing eating crisps and drinking from a can while driving ?......
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
and what happened to the airbags ? ....
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
He had two children in the car. They were eating the crisps and drinking from a can.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
It was around 2002
There was no frontal impact so I imagine they didn't deploy
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
En el artículo , dennis@home escribió:
No idea. I can't find the article I saw, but it had a diagram showing the location of pipework for retrofit external sprinklers on the Dubai Torch building.
This isn't the same link, but it'll do. It's too hot and my brane is melting.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
nothing new there...what is a brane? .....an extended object analogous to the strings of string theory?....
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
'course they were .....
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
They spent 70000 per flat on refurbishment compared to 50000 on similar block in a neighbouring borough so they can't blame it on "Tory cuts".
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
So have I - been the innocent victim in one case.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
At least he doesn't use other people's money to do it, Dave. Like you and your lot.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
But given how difficult it has proved to re-house the residents of one tower block, I don't see how he thinks it's remotely practical for "residents in hundreds of tower blocks with flammable cladding to be rehoused immediately unless the government can reassure them that their homes are safe"?
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
Seems they have only found 3 in London with the same cladding. And work is starting immediately to remove it. No need to re-house the tenants while this is sorted.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
Yes, good.
It seems the 600 figure was for "similar" cladding, not "same" cladding, but it still shows he's happy with sound-bite politics that he thinks it would be possible to rehouse the residents of 600 towers immediately.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
Rather depends on whether he knew the cladding posed the same risk or not. And until there is a proper enquiry, no one will. Could be the wrong fixing method (etc) made it a great deal worse.
What Camden are doing - according to the news on now - is to provide round the clock fire wardens in the effected buildings until the cladding is sorted.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
In message , at 17:41:32 on Thu, 22 Jun
2017, "Dave Plowman (News)" remarked:
You've caught that meme, it's *affected*.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
It doesn't mention BC in that article that I can see.
Andy
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
Would that really mitigate the risk?
NT
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
people learn not to get excited over typos.
- Vote on answer
- posted
6 years ago
In message , at
12:21:34 on Thu, 22 Jun 2017, snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com remarked:It's more than that - today both the PM and the BBC Newsperson referred to "effected", even if the printed versions say "affected".