OT Having a drink at home

I do have them fairly handy but no one in my family had a drink walking in the door like the movies.

I have a G&T or wine with dinner. On Mondays I do to my son's house for dinner and we have a drink before and wine with.

Somehow I forgot that my father used to have a drink when he got home from work. I was 8, too young to remember, but my mother said so. I don't even remember where he would have kept the glass, bottle, etc. We did not have a bar, or even a shelf. There was a buffet in the dining room.

On Saturday, February 5, 2022 at 9:41:16 PM UTC-5, micky wrote in alt.home.repair:

I like that Coconut Liqueurs (by 99, I think). Its very aromatic. It goes great with most any kind of soda.

Why wait until you get home?

The glove compartment isn't just for gloves.

I'm sure a fine upstanding citizen like you wouldn't break the law by drinking in a vehicle on a public roadway.

The *law* is your biggest concern in this situation?

At best, I'd put breaking the law in third place.

Unless you are the supervising driver.

Where is here?

You've been here long enough to know that speedy hails from down under.

Right...and from I've found, AU (or parts thereof) have (had?) a specific caveat regarding the supervising driver and drinking alcohol/open vessels.

That's why I was wondering where "here" is.

F*ck you.

No s*it, Sherlock.

The Guide for Supervising Drivers put out by vic.gov.au does.

Never said it was.

Never said it didn't.

Stop changing the subject.

Until you stop changing the subject matter of my comments, you can just f*ck off. Never once did I mention anything about a driving *instructor*.

Don't you know the difference between a "supervising driver" and a "driving instructor"?

Look it the f*ck up.

Which is specifically why I asked you 'Where is "here"?' f****it.

I wrote that "AU (or parts thereof) have a specific caveat regarding the supervising driver and drinking alcohol..."

Knowing which "parts thereof" you are calling "here" makes all the difference in what laws apply.

Are you so f'ing dumb that you don't know that they are two different things? Look it the f*ck up.

If you need me to post the link to the au.gov site that explains, in no uncertain terms, what the difference is, just ask nicely. Otherwise step away from the keyboard and stop trying to play with the big boys.

There is a reason most of us have Roddy in the kill file.

And there you have it folks...when a troll is beat, he changes his tune and makes believe he never said what we all know he said. The common ploy of troll that knows he's been bested. If it wasn't so predictable it would be funny.

Just a few hours ago Rod The Slow Speed Troll says "Just a different term for the same individual". The *same individual*. Now he twists what he said and adds pathetic qualifiers because he's too much of wimp to simply admit when he's wrong.

I really wish this was more challenging, but he makes it just so easy.

Like you just did?

And you are so f****ng stupid that you can't even manage to work out when its still me.

You can snip all the evidence you want. It doesn't change the facts.

You are wrong and you are a loser. However, you are fun to play with. Thank you for providing the opportunity.

And now the troll doesn't even realize that more than one thing can be discussed in the same thread. Oh my God, maybe even in the same post! Say it ain't so!

Actually that's probably not it. Even Slow Speed Rod-less isn't that stupid...or is he? This is probably just another of his lame attempts to back peddle away from his mistakes by spinning the discussion away from what was actually was said - and proven.

Hey look - I gave him credit for thinking something through. That's 'cuz I'm a nice guy. Nice to idiots even. Score one for the good guys.