Most absurd lie on a product

It happens that Brian Gaff (Sofa) formulated :

I don't recall brushless being possible in the 1960's.

People are clotting/dying from the experimental gene therapy so it's clearly not safe. And Fony Fauci claims the "vaccinated" still need to wear a mask so apparently the experimental gene therapy is not effective either. I'm pretty certain this Fauci prick is lying to us.

But you are not an ArtsStudent?. To an ArtsStudent?, stuff that goes in your arm is all the same.

Brushless controllers depend on microelectronics that didn't exist then. It would have been a can brushed motor and a gear box probably

At the beginning, there were around 110 or more projects to produce a virus. The methodology varies, but there might have been a half dozen different forms. One of our national news sites, had a long web page, tracking the various approaches. The reason so many projects took off, was to try to find something effective. When you read the article on RNA_Vaccine, you can see based on its research history, what a long shot it was.

For a summary of the successful and still-born efforts, see this article.

The AZ one seems to have a higher risk of clotting, than occurs naturally in humans. There are enough clotting problems in humans, before COVID came along, we have a national lab set up here which does nothing but "genetic tests for clotting conditions". If you're prone to such conditions, that lab can give a diagnosis so the doctor knows you've got a problem that needs careful attention. You can have a genetic predisposition to abnormal clotting.

The adenovirus is also modified so it cannot reproduce. The only exception is some question about the Russian Sputnik, where there are two adenoviruses, and one of them may not have been quiesced properly. You might have symptoms of a cold in that case, The Brazilians rejected Sputnik recently. The Russians don't agree with their analysis. I don't know if any other country or body is interested in repeating the Brazilian analysis or not, as verification. This represents a violation of protocol, rather than a clear and present danger. You're not supposed to make vaccines that way.

The Pfizer is a (messenger) RNA one. That's different than DNA, which is what makes your cells work. Work on the concept started in 1990 (that's to give time to collect all the three-eyed fish as a byproduct).

At least one of the two mRNA ones, there were patients with clotting, but the rate was the same as the rate for the general population who had not received a vaccine. Whereas the AZ one, the rate of clot for that is higher than background. And it looks like the Germans were likely right, in their estimate of the clot rate for AZ.

Paul

I am not sure that was in the end true..

At a rate barely above what happens in unvaccinated people; far lower than in people who catch Covid-19; and far lower than in women taking the pill.

There is no gene therapy, that is simply a term used by anti-vaxxers to spread fear. Gene therapy modifies your DNA and the vaccines do not.

The Pfizer vaccine contains a small section of mRNA (Messenger RNA) which cells use for communication. Normally these are naturally released around the body to instruct cells to produce particular proteins and are used up and eliminated. In this case the mRNA is introduced as a vaccine. For the short time that it is in the body, it persuades cells to make a protein with the same spikes as the virus, so that the immune system can learn to recognise it.

The Astra-Zeneca vaccine contains an altered monkey virus. Humans are incapable of catching this monkey virus, but the alteration contains the same spikes as the virus, so that the immune system can learn to recognise Covid-19.

Nothing is safe. You can die from drinking too much water!

The levels of risk are small; smaller than the risks of catching the virus; and a lot smaller than everyday risks that we are happy to take - driving or cycling for instance.

No vaccine is 100% effective - yet over many decades, they have protected billions of people and practically wiped out some deadly illnesses.

Yup, a democrat administration would have waited months and months and many more deaths to approve the vaccines.

Google up deaths from blood clots and you will see how common the problem is. Almost did me in 20 years ago and surgeon said his father had died from a clot.

Yeah I saw that, it reminds me of a shape I drew in primary school. Musk needs to invest in a wind tunnel. Those sharp corners are not aerodynamic.

All product specs are lies. The CPU cooler in this computer claims it will cool a 300W CPU. Mine gives off only 140W, and that gives a temperature rise of 55C, according to both my readings and those of 3 review sites. 300W would cause a temperature difference of 120C, so to keep it below the usual maximum of 100C, you'd need a room temperature of -20.

Even the 140W is odd, this CPU is rated at 105W. Maybe they don't account for you using every single part of it simultaneously.

Nothing should ever ever go inside your arm. And I didn't take art.

Why can't they make these things in tablet form, this is the 21st century ffs.

Yes it was and was seen in the UK too when they went looking for that.

Like the 500w amplifier I bought, more like 5w in use.

Mike

silicon gives up at around 180°C

Possibly because the drug or medication would be broken down before it ever got into your bloodstream

Could it be that the cooler *would* be able to handle a CPU that dissipated more power, but its fan is thermostatically controlled to cut out / reduce speed once an acceptable temperature is reached. My CPU runs at about 50 deg C. Occasionally the temperature rises and I hear the fan go to jet-aircraft-at-takeoff speed to cool the CPU, then reduce to normal once the temp is back in acceptable limits to avoid a continuous loud noise.

And how do you know it's 140W ?

What would the error bars be on that measurement, in your considered opinion ?

One site used to measure the coolers, and it appears to still do some of them.

Noctua NH-D15 high 10.9C for 125W input or 0.087 C/W.

If room is 25C, inside case air is 35C, 140*0.087=12.18C rise or 47C.

And the processor in question, never gets even remotely close to throttling temperature. If we try the maths at

If we knew your cooler model, it would be easier to work out examples. Maybe Frostytech never measured it, as there's a lot of coolers out there. And measuring them all with a constant jig setup, gives a chance for a fair comparison.

Paul