Re: FYA: An extract from Lionel's nfilter config

Sep 03, 2004 243 Replies

Gonna crank it up to 50 kilowatts per channel, better cover your ears :-)

.___________. _______ _______.___________. __ .__ __. _______ | || ____| / | || | | \ | | / _____| `---| |----`| |__ | (----`---| |----`| | | \| | | | __ | | | __| \ \ | | | | | . ` | | | |_ | | | | |____.----) | | | | | | |\ | | |__| | |__| |_______|_______/ |__| |__| |__| \__| \______|

.___________. _______ _______.___________. __ .__ __. _______ | || ____| / | || | | \ | | / _____| `---| |----`| |__ | (----`---| |----`| | | \| | | | __ | | | __| \ \ | | | | | . ` | | | |_ | | | | |____.----) | | | | | | |\ | | |__| | |__| |_______|_______/ |__| |__| |__| \__| \______|

d888 .d8888b. .d8888b. d8888 d88P Y88b d88P Y88b 888 888 .d88P 888 .d88P 8888" 888 .od888P" "Y8b. 888 d88P" 888 888 888 888" Y88b d88P 8888888 888888888 "Y8888P"

I don't think I want to pass a pentium. Last time I tried that pins 47 thru' 78 got caught on my small intestine.

o.k.

But, just in case someone asks, why?

Peter Hucker wrote in :

You have a really big ASCII...

Peter Hucker wrote in :

:

thru' 78 got caught on my small intestine.

Try a 286?

ah wrote in :

:

Well nothing under 400MHz...its very picky...

I warned you it was 50kW per channel. And you just distorted it! Your speakers I mean your newsreader is no good!

And XP would be happy under 400MHz?

GUI isn't everything . . . but it sure helps.

Is that a vehicular item?

For once I wasn't saying windows was any better, just that nothing is happy under

400MHz.

I'm getting really pissed off with how slow this dual Athlon MP 2800+ machine is. Will have to get the 64 bit ones soon.

Peter Hucker wrote in :

speakers I mean your newsreader is no good!

My newsreader goes up to 11!

Peter Hucker wrote in :

:

happy under 400MHz.

machine is. Will have to get the 64 bit ones soon.

Thank you Billy Two Sheds...thats just huger than soup.

Which planet are you speaking to us from?

Hold that wallet a bit until you're sure:

most "slowness" is because of the storage-bus bottleneck.

You could have 5 terabytes of storage accessible by a liquid-nitrogen-cooled 14CPU system, but still get the responsiveness of a 80386.

Of course, XP is a bottleneck in, and of, itself.

I removed the storage bottleneck. Four 250MB 7200rpm drives connected to a £250

3ware 66MHz/64bit PCI RAID card. The processors can't write data that fast!

Besides I have 2GB of RAM, soon to be 3GB.

Sounded like a Peugeot.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required