External hard drives...

what has a crooked sales outlet got to do with computer engineers?

Reply to
tim...
Loading thread data ...

If you're doing a reglar, automatic, backup then the speed doesn't matter particularly. And if it's set up to do incremental backups, then each one takes very little time.

Proper computers come with that sort of software as standard.

Reply to
Tim Streater

As per a previous discussion on the subject (that I started), it seems that

1tB SSDs devices are virtually unobtainable in the consumer space

It is vanishingly unlikley that Mr Numpty has just bought a new one, let alone already historically owned one

Reply to
tim...

why should whether you dragged it or not, make any difference to a disk-to-disk copy. It only makes any difference for a directory to directory copy on the same disk

Reply to
tim...

Well no, they are fairly common now

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

1TB Thumb drives are typically not yet available, but proper external 2.5" drive caddies with 1TB SSDs is are fairly easy to get.

Well quite, but it only seems fair to ask, since the chances of him actually volunteering any useful information are slim!

Reply to
John Rumm

ok, answer this:

Google maps tells me its going to take 3 hours to get to the office, is that right?

Reply to
John Rumm

Hard drive lives matter!

Reply to
alan_m

my computers are road kill...I have been told...

Reply to
Jim GM4DHJ ...

be wurser if it was black slave and white master.....tee hee

Reply to
Jim GM4DHJ ...

Because you incur significant overhead on file creation - especially with lots of small files, when compared to say a disk clone style copy.

Also windows will also spend sometimes significant amounts of time enumerating the directory tree you are copying so that it can give you a progress dialogue with an estimate of total time - so that slower than doing robocopy from the command line for example.

Reply to
John Rumm

Given the setup you are using, using something like Acronis true image[1] will clone one drive to the other faster than you will be able to do with a file copy. However the USB2 interface will still limit the maximum speed.

[1] The trial version will do a drive to drive clone.

(for reference I was cloning some 120GB SSD drives onto new 256GB drives

- one drive on the internal SATA bus in the PC - the new one on a USB to SATA adaptor. Doing it with the new drive on a USB2 interface was taking

40 mins or so, and on a USB3 interface about 8 mins)
Reply to
John Rumm

They have to be fairly sophisticated and computer literate to get the drives to misreport their size? TBH, I've never tried. Perhaps it's easy?

Reply to
GB

I wanted to know whether Chummy was doing it via D/D or something like CCC which I suppose might be faster, if more obscure.

Reply to
Tim Streater

Fine. But don't come whining to us about it.

Reply to
Tim Streater

Just bang the drives together really hard. That'll learn them.

You were clearly bored and asking a question for attention, rather than because you wanted the answer.

Reply to
GB

:)

It's clearly not fair, and you should write to Boris to do something about it. Plus, move closer to your office. That commute must be killing you.

Reply to
GB

Wasn't Tim Berners-Lee was it ?.

Reply to
Andrew

yes it was a waste of time...

Reply to
Jim GM4 DHJ ...

Ballox

Reply to
Jim GM4DHJ ...

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.