On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:46:09 -0700, email@example.com wrote:
It's not. There's (almost) no chance (well, it's never zero) that they'll
run a pipe way out here for an alternative fuel.
Electricity, I guess, is the other option - but at the cost of electricity
in California being something like 50 cents a kwh (top tier), that's not
going to work out mathematically (without adding a $50K solar investment
to the mix anyway).
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:13:49 -0500, Unquestionably Confused wrote:
That's an interesting question, as I hadn't considered any other
option but propane.
I guess, if I stop using gas, my options are:
- For heating: Use a wood burner instead
- For hot water: Use electricity
- For the stove: Use electricity
- For the pool: Don't heat it
- For the BBQ: Use a portable propane tank
- For the dryer: Use electricity
- In which case, I'd add solar panels (for sure!)
But, at this point, I don't think it's reasonable to think I'll
invest in switching over all that equipment to alternative fuels.
On Friday, September 27, 2013 11:06:14 AM UTC-4, Kurt Ullman wrote:
Good grief, yes! Solar is far more cost effective than
any pool heating alternative. In CA you would think solar would be
the way to go for a pool heater. I'm actually surprised
I don't see them here in NJ. The main downside is that it
takes a fairly large array, ballpark about the size of the
pool surface area. So, you either need roof area for that,
are OK with how it looks, or need to ground mount it. But
compared to say nat gas, it's just about free to run. And
those gas heaters are 200 - 400K btus, a real disaster.
Out of curiosity, what are you paying for gas?
I used Amerigas for a number of years...until I noticed (wife pays the
bills) that they were charging $5.25/gal. That was 4-5 years ago. I
switched to a smaller company, they charged $3.25. They were bought out by
Amerigas so I switched to Ferrell 2-3 years ago; they started out at about
$3.25 are now $5.00+.
IME, all the gas companies low ball you initially, rapidly bump it up
Wow. That's high. Propane is propane. There is no tax involved (we have
to sign a tax form saying we're not reselling it).
If you bring a tank over to my place, I'll sell it to you at my cost!
Here, by the way, are *my* historical prices, based on being in this
coop (which is a no brainer since the coop only costs $15 per year).
These are the prices we're charged in the coop, going back to 1999:
Wow. You're paying a huge markup because propane is propane so
cheaper is better. Your prices are strange. I wonder what *other*
people are paying for propane this month?
Normally we're screwed here in California so I'm surprised we're cheaper.
Almost never is it the other way around.
For example, here are the state's gasoline prices:
But, more to the point, here are the state's propane prices:
I get a discount off those prices because I'm in this coop:
The coop tells us:
"Propane companies buy gas at wholesale from the big suppliers at the
wholesale rate, called the Warren posting, which is published.
We pay that published wholesale cost + a markup of 56 cents per gallon."
You seem to be paying a HUUUUUGE markup, of dollars per gallon. :(
Depends on where you look. Here's a site showing what people actually pay.
Absolutely! Florida is consistently higher than most any other place and
Polk County is the highest (or close to) in Florida.
I'd change suppliers but they are few here; initially, they all start off
much lower but soon the price is again ridiculous.
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 7:56:06 PM UTC-4, Alex Gunderson wrote:
How could he know for sure, unless he works for company #2?
It's possible company #2's name is on it, but maybe the
previous owner bought and paid for it. Did the sales contract
say anything, one way or the other? If I was selling a house
with a propane tank, I'd be sure to spell out if it's included
or not, and if not, who actually owns it.
I'm not a lawyer either, but I'm pretty sure you can't
sell what you don't own. Meaning if the tank was in fact
the property of a company and the previous owner did not
own it, then by selling the house they can't transfer ownership
to you just because they sold the house.
But the previous owner probably did, if it in fact
really is their tank. So far, all you have is a workman
saying it belonged to company #2. Isn't there any
identification on it? When you chose company #1 to be
your gas provider, I would think they would ask if you
have a tank, need a tank, etc. And if you have a tank,
I would think they would come out and inspect it before
delivering gas to make sure it's safe. You would think
during that process the issue of it being company #2's
tank would have come up, but I guess not.
If it really is their tank, I doubt that is going to work.
Not if they have a signed contract with the previous owner
that lays out the terms of the lease and protects the
company's rights like they normally would.
That sounds perfectly reasonable and right to me.
Why are you even worried about it? Unless someone is
now demanding you pay for the tank, what's the problem?
Another possible angle, if you can still contact the seller,
ask them who's tank it is. They may have bought it, or had it
on lease, then bought it, etc. And again, anything in the
contract about the tank? If it says the tank is included and
someone shows up saying it's their tank and can prove it, then
you'd have a claim against the seller. But if the contract is
silent on the issue, I doubt you have a case.
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:25:52 -0700, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
I think they go by serial number but I'm not sure.
Actually, there is no name on the tank other than the manufacturer
on the nameplate and a serial number and the poundage figures, and things
Nothing about the tank. It said the property was "as is".
I understand. When I first entered into the agreement with company 1
for the propane delivery, they asked for a bill of sale. I didn't have
one so they accepted an affidavit that I wrote saying I owned it.
I never thought anything of it at the time, but that's all I really
have that "specifically" mentions the tank ownership.
OK. This makes sense.
But, did company 2 "abandon" the tank?
Sort of like a ship at sea is abandoned and then anyone can have it?
Yes. There is a nameplate with a serial number, a date of manufacturer,
a company of manufacturer, the weight, and a bunch of other poundage figures.
They did that years ago. I don't think the issue is safety.
The tank is in great shape. It will outlast the United States, let alone
the house, and me.
I don't see how, from just the serial number, company 1 would know
anything about company 2. All they knew (and all I knew) at the time
was that it certainly wasn't company 1's tank.
So they've been filling it for years.
Well, if they do have a signed lease, that would be interesting.
I don't know that this exists. I never once spoke to the previous owner.
I never even met them. They essentially walked away from the property.
Because I want to line up my ducks.
Just in case they come to me, I don't want to say something stupid.
I just want to know where I stand, legally.
I do realize this is a home-repair group - but - I was hoping someone
would have experience with this, first hand - and then could provide
I do appreciate the help as I know you don't have to advise me.
The answer is there's no way for anyone here to know -- we're not in
possession of facts not available (sorta' goes w/o saying but in law
everything 'pends on the specifics).
In all likelihood the case is as outlined previously presuming that the
tank doesn't go back beyond the even the other company you do know of.
I don't think you can determine any real definitive answer to the
question w/o further data either confirming as you say from a S/N
whether the tank did come from one or the other companies in question if
they have such records and can therefrom produce previous history.
Clearly you own the property in question; whether the tank was the
previous occupant's to transfer is in doubt apparently so there is no
way to rely on that as has been noted previously as well.
All in all, unless a phone call to the alternate company can shed light
on whether it was there I suspect the cost involved in establishing the
actual pedigree would probably exceed the value of the tank.
If it hasn't been an issue so far, I'd suspect it's unlikely to become
one in the future.
After googling and googling and googling, I've come to the
belated realization that this is a relatively common situation.
I couldn't find any California statutes, so all I have is anecdotal
forum and usenet situations, all of which have their myriad details,
but it seems like the tank belongs to whomever can prove they own it.
I went back to my title papers, and there is just no mention of the
tank. Since the serial number is presumably unique, I am slowly
realizing it's probably their tank, and not mine, as I have thought
all this time.
I will call the title insurance company today, to see if they'll
compensate me for my $2,000 loss - but - since it's not actually
mentioned in the paperwork, I doubt it's something they deal with.
So, now I'm making plans for buying a new tank, and putting it in
It looks like I'll need the following (based on new regulations
of distance from the house and earthquake resistance which had
grandfathered the original tank but don't apply to new):
* new 1,000 gallon propane tank ** reinforced concrete pad with tie-down eyehooks or lag bolts ** trench must be 12" deep minimum & 18" if driven over ** underground yellow flexible conduit (25' minimum distance) ** two galvanized steel risers at the tank ** high pressure regulator at the tank for the house ** low pressure regulator at the tank for the pool & BBQ ** low pressure regulator at the house *
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:01:06 +0000 (UTC), Alex Gunderson
What loss? I don't see you having a loss. You bought the house and
land it sits on. If the guy across the street happened to be parked
in your driveway on the day you closed, would you get to keep his car?
The tank, if owned by the propane company, happens to be on the land
you don't get ownership. This is something that should have been
resolved to your satisfaction before closing.
I don't see the title company getting involved. Would they help you
if the previous owner left the refrigerator No, that is not covered
under title insurance. It only covers real property against claims,
liens, and that type of thing.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.