No, just thought I'd go slummin' ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
O/T: Knee Jerk
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Do us all a favour and move that time line up substantially, will you? With all the bullshit you spew you're likely to exfoliate everybody else in rec.woodworking long before you manage to do the same to yourself.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
The kind of freedom I'm talking about is much more involved and costly than your trivial reference to it as border control. It consists of the society you live in that permits fools like you to spout your crap. That freedom costs money. It's the money for police forces that let you walk the streets without being attacked. It's also the money involved in hiring the people to legislate the laws that tolerate people like you. It's even the infrastructure that takes your garbage away and paves the streets you drive on.
As usual, you're such a useless twit, that I keep finding myself drawn into your rhetoric. One day perhaps, you might find yourself somewhere that you can make a real contribution. But, it's certainly not rec.woodworking where you've contributed absolutely nothing in several years of showing everybody what an selfish, whining, little ass you are.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Go on then...stop dragging your ass in here...
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Aw how cute, you and your life partner Upscale missed me ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Isn't in interesting how some, who are offended by remarks, simply want the speaker to shut up? Or go away? Or want his wife to feed him lots of pork chops so he'll die of a heart attack?
In history, exile, shunning, ostracism, and the like were often employed for those who violated the norms of society or arrayed themselves against the political order.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Like Guantanamo?
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Tim, thanks for being a good sport and sharing your opinion with us, predictable as it is.
You may want to work on mental agility, as you seem to have a certain rigidity in your though process.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Like Guantanamo?
Isn't that a salad? Wait...oh never mind. I'm thinking of guacamole.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Pretty much, except there are those who advocate integrating the Gitmo Guests into Mr Rogers neighborhood.
In my view, that's carrying the anti-exile mindset a bit too far.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
I prefer to stick with rational thought as opposed to the "agility" that passes for commentary these days.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Oh fur chrissakes don't get him fomenting....
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Sorry, Dave. As you have noticed, this is primarily a coffee clatch of experts that get together and exchange their expert opinions on politics and economics.
Few are woodworkers, and it is pretty much the same guys every time that adamantly expressed their opinions backed by furious googling to make sure they get it right. They rail out at an unjust world that doesn't understand how things should be (according to them, anyway).
You would be better to killfile the posters, not the posts.
Robert
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
That just cracked me up....
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
I love you man ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
L'shana tova, tikatevu
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
No, he means Tim is so predictable that almost anyone here could write his posts for him :-).
But I may be unfair to Tim - he may have changed - I haven't read his posts in a long time.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
By that you mean he doesn't ever agree with the bottom feeding, freedom hating, socialist bastards that attempt to debate him, right?
I guess thats better than simply calling him a "useless twit", or a "misguided douche-nozzle"...
Well, different words anyway...
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Yes, that is the only way to go. Most ARE woodworkers though, but here is a short list to get him started:
JBStein Robotoy Upscale Lew Hodgett Larry Blanchard Andrew Barss Han J.Clark Tom Watson DGDevin Charlieb Morris Dovey Perry Aynum Scott Lurndal Buck Turgidson Douglas Johnson Chris Friesen Tom Veatch Tim Daneliuk Phisherman Mark & Juanita HeyBub Ed Pawlowski CW
I may of missed a few that haven't posted in the last 2 weeks, and I may have skipped a couple that do post political on occasion but not enough to bother with, or just not in last 2 weeks. I didn't include those that only post off topic about non-political things like food, recipes and so on. Everyone listed has participated in an off topic politcal thread in the last 2 weeks. Anyone I excluded or included that doesn't like it... try harder.
- Vote on answer
- posted
14 years ago
Well, yeah. Morality is absolute and there are only so many ways to describe it. Liberalism is, however, situational and there are millions of ways to fashion the explanation. It's the difference between:
- Thou shalt not murder, and
- Killing someone should be avoided execpt in the following cases: a. When the subject is an abusive spouse, b. When the subject is a potentially abusive spouse c. When the subject is someone the potentially abusive spouse knew d. When the subject is the sexual partner of a spouse e. When the subject is the potential sexual partner of a spouse f. When the subject is a fetus, g. When the subject is a potential fetus, h. When the subject is a child molester (but not by the state), i. When the subject might be a child molester (but not by the state) j. When there is no difference between the subject and the aggrieved (race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age, ability to speak Lithuanian, etc.) ...