He figured out how to turn it on; he can damn well figure out how to turn it off, too. He's been asked several times to do that, and has explicitly refused.
He figured out how to turn it on; he can damn well figure out how to turn it off, too. He's been asked several times to do that, and has explicitly refused.
Then you haven't been reading the right books -- and you haven't been using Google either. [...]
That is the essence of the problem.
One more thing, strypie: turn that damn x-no-archive thing OFF.
I agree. Not to pick on this poster in particular, but rather the existence of the no-archive flag, if you can test for that, on the principal that if someone doesn't want his questions to stay around for others' benefit, maybe he shouldn't benefit from the answers.
Uncalled for. I don't like his no-archive crap either, but what does this add to the conversation? I personally think he should continue to use his no-archive bit when dealing with personal issues, and leave them off when dealing with general info thinks like on this forum.
Well, apparently the no-archive flag isn't working to well for him..
What is this *No Archive* buisness you're on about?
It's supposed to keep Google from keeping your posts indefinitely.
I see,so wouldnt the sensible thing to do then is not reply to his post.
Actually, I've tried to help the lad a time or two, but finally gave up ... and not from being uncharitable ... but because there is something uniquely disturbing about questions being deliberately and calculatingly worded (witness similar behavior in other groups) in such a manner that the answer must necessarily encompass the entire history of the subject in order to suffice.
In any event, my hats off to those who continue to attempt to do so ... you're a better man than me, I'll freely admit.
RE: Subject
That clown has been in my kill file forever; however, when people I respect, feed this troll by answering him, I end up getting sucked in again, because I think enough of you to open your posts.
Oh well, just kill the subject I guess.
Lew
| My kitchen cabinet doors have a rounded over inside edge on the | rails and stiles. How are those put on there? I mean, are they | machine before assembly or after? And how woudl I duplicate it at | home?
Most probably with a roundover router bit (or molding cutter on a shaper) before assembly. In a home shop, I'd suggest a roundover router bit equipped with a pilot bearing.
| The reason I ask is sometime down the road I want to build a cabinet | ove rmy toilet in the bathroom to match my sink cabinet.
I would suggest you cut the roundover prior to assembly with a bit equipped with a pilot bearing. You'd find it impossible to rout the roundover at the inside corners after assembly.
| Also, in a magazine I have they sell for the router a "rail and | style" bit. It looks sort of like it puts a toungu and grove in | wood. What are these used for?
These bits are used to make all of the molding cuts of rails and stiles in a single pass, as opposed to multiple passes with more bits with different profiles.
What is uncalled for? Letting other readers of this group know that the OP has posted in dozens of forums the same questions he posts here: "I have this tool... and I can't get it to work right..."
Maybe others didn't know the OP is an attention seeker that repeatedly posts vague unanswerable questions in other forums as well as this one.
this post YOU wrote you whiny little prick:
humiliation. Good job!
Guess we should also feel some empathy for your lack of a life. Think about it. You're following the exploits of a guy with sexual problems.
Then take a freakin woodworking course!
On the other, it establishes him as a troll. The woodworking questions are just maybe serious, but no one in (in their right mind or otherwise) would post something like that.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required