Interesting question

Joe · 2009-07-14T21:21:12+00:00

Very Interesting questions. More questions, and this time some_good_ questions.While some have little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birthissue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issuecan be resolved by Obama answering one simple question:*_What passport did he use when he was shuttling betweenNew York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come upwith the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?*And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , andKarachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customsand Immigration?*The American people not only deserve to have answers to thesequestions, they must have answers.It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.*Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?A : Yes, by his own admission.*Q: What passport did he travel under?A: There are only three possibilities.1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,2) He traveled with a British passport, or3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport.Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's"no travel" list in 1981.Conclusion:When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with aBritish passport or an Indonesian passport.If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proofthat he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would tend toprove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held,British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesianstep-father in 1967.Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how hemanaged to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..Given the destructive nature of his plans for...

Jul 14, 2009 47 Replies

Rate this thread:

CW 17 years ago

You're forgiven. You can't help where you were born.

Vote

jo4hn 17 years ago

Actually it's from a depressed elephant.

Vote

Tom Watson 17 years ago

No, that's a malt.

Bush was definitely talking horse****, er, piss.

Regards,

Tom Watson

formatting link

Vote

Mark & Juanita 17 years ago

... snip

Seems a strange way for the huge corporations to be running the world -- having their stock taken over by the government, their CEO fired by POTUS, and the company "re-distributed" to the government and the unions. Yeah, those corporations, they're pretty powerful and sly, yep.

Vote

evodawg 17 years ago

Last time I looked GM was not a bank and has no powerful lobbyist working the Politicians. There will be no new regulations on Wall Street. Wall Street owns Congress.

Vote

Nova 17 years ago

Then it looks like GM spent just shy of $14,000,000 in 2008 on "not" working the politicians.

formatting link

Vote

evodawg 17 years ago

formatting link

Pennies compared to finance and Investment Lobby.

Vote

J. Clarke 17 years ago

formatting link

>> Pennies compared to finance and Investment Lobby.

And distributed among the members of Congress it gives each one about 2 percent of the cost of their political campaign.

Vote

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required