Windpower

Especially if the AA dont get there in time

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher
Loading thread data ...

Sorry, must have missed that. I always thought the plan was multiple generating plant, not just one big power station.

Reply to
John Rumm

Really? Care to provide figures?

Ah - *just* energy again. The blinkered view.

And you can't see further than the end of your nose.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

You've rather missed the point that this wasn't the case with this power cut.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Keep banging the drum. There is a simple answer to everything in your little world. And you are never wrong.

Don't you find it odd that no country in the world seems to agree with you?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Eggs, John. Not egg.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

The point that there would be a net loss of energy involved in extracting and then using hydrogen is not blinkered. Indeed, ignoring this would be barking mad.

Reply to
Roger Hayter

Basket, not eggs.

Reply to
Robin

baskets, not basket

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

OK then. How would you translate eggs and basket in this case?

Multiple grids from one generator? ;-)

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

e.g Hinkley C would count as two 1630MW eggs in one basket.

Reply to
Andy Burns

Quite.

There is a possible argument that replicating the /same/ nuclear power station would be "one basket" because of the risk of a fatal design flaw emerging. C.f. lack of genetic diversity in e.g. bananas. At present though...chance would be a fine thing?

Reply to
Robin

What's needed in this is a basket case ;-) to hold all the baskets.

Reply to
whisky-dave

I thought we were discussing baskets...

Reply to
John Rumm

Not really.

It woudl be two compeletely separaqte power stations sharing only a perimeter fence

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

What is te risk that a fatal design flaw would result in both sides being shut down within minutes? None

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Do power stations that are split into "units" have totally separate interconnects/switchyards/whatever?

Reply to
Andy Burns

depends what you mean by 'interconnects'

Typically ther are at least two trunk EHT routes leading from a power station and of course they (the reator/turbines assys) are independently switched

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Not at all. I was not saying what failed this time, I was simply pointing out one simple, single point of failure that can apply to *all* wind power at the same time. Similarly, night is a single point for solar power.

No other forms of energy have such a single point vulnerability.

You could argue that coal, gas or diesel are subject to disruption to supplies from abroad, but that would only reduce availability, not remove it completely, we have a (small) reserve and supplies can be routed from elsewhere.

SteveW

Reply to
Steve Walker

I had in mind a flaw that required all Model X reactors to be shut down without delay for inspection (c.f. Boeing's current little difficulties). Probability very small indeed but with a massive impact if X is all we've got.

Reply to
Robin

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.