In that case, you are free to stop arguing.
That's good news, isn't it? :-)
In that case, you are free to stop arguing.
That's good news, isn't it? :-)
I do realise you have the memory span of a goldfish, and wish to contradict any facts on here for your own political purposes. But this group isn't controlled by the like of Putin. If you wish to propagate your lies, prepare to be shown up as a fool.
But at least you'll get support from Streater who doesn't like inconvenient facts either.
All I have done is to invite you to support your own case (whatever it may be) or not to support your own case, if that's what you prefer.
It's completely up to you which of those two you choose. No-one can choose for you.
My guess at the moment is that you will do neither of the things mentioned above, ie, you won't post evidence to support your case and you won't stop arguing.
You will simply carry on with more of the above.
I asked you what statistics on NHS waiting lists you'd accept as being accurate.
But no surprise you declined to answer.
Likely after extensive searching to find figures to agree with your lies.
Yes you did.
And I said that you must produce whatever you wish to produce. It's up to you, not to me.
That is a lie.
I said that you must / may produce what you want to produce.
That was an answer. Perhaps not the one you wanted, but most definitely an answer.
You're the one telling porkies. There's one a few lines above this, for a start.
Well Sweetie you haven't posted any inconvenient facts yet. All you've done is wriggle.
Please don't post the vids when the three of you daisy chain. TIA
That you are unwilliung to find what you'd consider a reliable source of NHS waiting lists merely says you already know you're talking bollocks. Again.
Go on then. Post some statistics showing NHS waiting lists over the years
- say since 2000. Won't take you any longer than posting your usual pointless replies.
But I'll give you some to be going on with. At random - the first three found by Google.
It's your beef.
Why don't *you* post them?
I am certainly not prepared to fight your case for you, if that's what you mean.
If you have evidence to support the claims you're making (obviously, you don't), why not just cite it?
TL:DR
Make your case in your own words, citing it with quotes from whatever source(s) you say are reliable.
Posting URL without comment is trolling.
My 'case' as you put it is already won.
But as a BoJo supporter, you'll be used to him manipulating crime figures to make him look good. So no surprise you wish to too.
Oddly, I've not heard any government spokesman saying NHS waiting lists have gone down. But plenty promises of new money and extra hospitals, nurses and doctors etc to try and achieve this.
In your own mind, where you vanquish imaginary foes by brandishing no weapons of any sort but instead resort to asking them which mythical sword they would prefer to be attacked with.
Crime figures?
What are you talking about?
Neither have I.
And do you know why that is?
That's right, it's because there's been a near two year period when the normal business of hospitals has been all but suspended, for totally understandable reasons.
Tell you what... why don't you post another twenty or thirty or posts along the same lines as recently, in which you claim that the evidence you haven't posted and the arguments you haven't been able to make mean that you've "won"?
Don't expect too much trouble to be taken over replies to them, though.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required