Not anymore. for a reason.
Not anymore. for a reason.
He might not have anything at all except a f***ed up use of the test.
Like hell he has with his woman infected.
So it doesn't matter how many he kills ?
Because if he takes covid there, it is even worse than a cruise ship given that on a cruise ship they don't all share the same showers etc.
You don't want to hazard a guess as to what his speed was, or should have been?
You can see what conclusion would fall to be drawn from that, surely?
Where do you get that from?
The UK HC says 1.5m and does not specify the relative speeds involved.
I have often thought that a van driving around the area, confiscating unlit bikes and when full, taking them to the pound and charging a fee for release would be a very good thing and cyclist would soon get the idea.
Where? What page? What Rule number?
They could do the same for cycling on the pavement, disobeying road signs and traffic lights, going the wrong way in one-way streets, etc.
Yes, but cycling without lights is the most obvious and likely to be seen by the police.
As for cycling on the pavement, I don't actually object to that, as long as they are travelling at a sensible speed and making proper allowances for pedestrians.
:-)
FFS, it is rod speed you're responding to.
WTF?! Up to here, this sounds a lot like the UK right now. We are doomed.
Blitzkrieg was the practical application of work done in Britain in the late 1920s. General Heinz Guderian personally paid for translations of the writings of British experts. However, the General Staff in Britain thought infantry support tanks were the future, rather than fast cruiser tanks, so the British Army had the theory, but not the experience.
That any attempt to make a quantitive judgement of vehicle speed by anybody outside it is notoriously unreliable and, therefore, of little value. However, qualitative judgments of speed, such as travelling too fast for the conditions, are much more likely to be correct.
Ah!, yes, quite right, thank you.
"Crushing them" is the action at the pound that your were looking for.
Where? What page? What Rule number?
Completely subjective and conditioned by things which cannot be known to the participants at the time (ie, what will happen in the future).
20:20 hindsight.
Only if the release fee and the fine are not paid within a reasonable time, surely?
A week? Two weeks?
But it is legal on some one way streets.
I merely get annoyed by cyclists breaking the law. And cycling at night with dark clothing and no lights. But get more upset when they always blame a car etc driver for any accident.
As if. What cyclist - except a toddler - ever goes at walking pace?
Round here, the only place you're allowed to let a dog off the leash is on the common. Where cycling is banned - apart from on designated routes. Doesn't stop them cursing at dogs anywhere on the common.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required