OT: New driving laws and cyclists etc

Mar 31, 2022 Last reply: 4 years ago 230 Replies

Which is kind of the point I wanted to make. Some road users need more clearance than others. It is not enough just to miss hitting them.

That would be my only criticism of the driver. If he slowed down and the cyclists took no action then I don't see the difference between driving slowly past them or the LR being stationary. Either way they have the same clearance.

Or the cyclist should have stopped and let the vesicle pass

vesicle?

What was the Vesicle doing on the road in the first place?

formatting link

No, the cyclist is much more aware of their positional relationship with respect to the car. They can react better if something goes wrong.

It is safer to let the cyclist control the manoeuvre. This isn't for one man up man ship sake, it is just safer.

And don't call me Shirley

:-)

Judith would concur.

But IMO, and if I were the driver, I'd pull over and stop, or at least creep along. Same as I would for a bunch of runners. Common courtesy.

Quite, they could have got off their bikes on his approach.

I assume that you have never uncounted the men in Lycra who believe they own all of the road (both sides) on their regular "Tour de Rural Roads" racing tournaments.

In my experience most cyclists show no common courtesy towards other road users.

Thank you for your insightful contribution.

You mean those foolish shoes that clip onto the pedals? They ought to be illegal - using them means you're not in control of your vehicle as you can't put your feet down as required to control it.

Meaning what? That clipped on shoes are not clipped on?

I wouldn't have an issue of banning them if it means they're less likely to fall off and hurt themselves.

I always give horses, cattle, sheep, pigs etc. priority. Cyclists should be treated in the same way as the other dumb animals. If only they'd keep to the dumb bit.

she did typical stupid wummin road user....he was miles away from them...and why did only she fall off....wummin just don't have the grasp

*if it means*. People who don't use clipless pedals (which is what clipped on are actually bizarrely called) seem to have built a fantasy argument that they are dangerous, with a complete lack of evidence.

The truth is that in practice, experienced cyclists naturally unclip in an emergency, and being clipped into the pedal means they have the safety advantage of stopping a cyclist's foot slipping unexpectedly off the pedal, which is a potential accident. That is why so many cyclists use them.

Precisely. You often see these lycra louts at traffic lights, wobbling back and forth so can avoid putting a foot to the ground which is what any proper cyclist would do. Loony behaviour.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required