New battery tech?

Would be nice if some of this turned out to be true.

formatting link

Tim

Reply to
Tim+
Loading thread data ...

Interesting. I see they're claiming the battery will charge in minutes rather than hours.

Say a typical car petrol tank holds 12 gallons. 1 gallon of petrol has an energy equivalent of 33.4kWh

formatting link

So a typical car petrol tank contains an energy equivalent of about

400kWh. If that were to be replaced by a battery storage system, which was wanted to be recharged in say 5 minutes (one twelfth of an hour), as is done now with a petrol filling system, that would require a power input of 4800kW (400x12). At 1000 amps that would be 4800 volts (assuming my logic and numbers are correct, which they may not be!).

I'd be interested to see the forecourt of the future!

But I imagine things would no longer be done that way. If those batteries are truly reliable, then an exchange system would probably be the way things would go. Or perhaps an induction system, where you just drive in, position your car over an induction plate and let it charge, with no electrical linkages at all.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

Applying Betteridge's law of headlines, I guess the answer is likely to be "no".

Reply to
Caecilius

Well, of course. That's what happens now, but the problem arises when you want to drive further than the capacity of your battery will allow, and you have to re-charge en route.

Car petrol engines around about 20% max, a bit more for diesel. Probably triple that for electric cars, so by implication only half the equivalent tank capacity needed. But that still leaves some pretty hefty amps/volts needed for charging. See

formatting link
for some numbers.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

Surely, triple => one-third capacity needed?

If you add in that electric cars tend to have regenerative braking and so on, it gets better still.

One way petrol engines score is that they use waste heat for warming the passengers.

Reply to
GB

Interesting numbers.

Just for comparison, the biggest wind turbines are, I think, approaching

5 MW and their generator is probably bigger than a Transit van. A 5 MW marine diesel is getting on for the size of a shipping container. A 5 MW gas turbine is about the size of a car.

I don't know offhand the capacity of the 11kV and 33 kV power lines (the ones which are still on wooden poles). I guess a single 11kV line would probably service a multi-terminal garage OK.

Reply to
newshound

Except that a typical electric motor is miles more efficient than any IC one. Of course heating the car will increase energy consumption- that comes free with an IC engine.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Electric motors produce heat, too, but not nearly as much.

Reply to
GB

Yes, absolutely correct. The initial figures I found suggested a factor of two difference, but later I found the factor of three, but I omitted to correct that bit.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

Several manufacturers seem to have 8MW monsters now

Reply to
Andy Burns

Sorry to be pedantic. :)

Anyway, it seems that an electric car with a fully charged 100kWh battery should be able to do much the same range as a petrol car on a single tank. Glancing at Tesla, they are claiming about 300 mile range for their cars with the biggest batteries. That would suit me fine, as 4 hours is my absolute maximum drive.

Reply to
GB

it's not that simple though, is it

if you were visiting me for the weekend there is nowhere you could recharge your car when you arrive

so your battery has to be good for the round trip

(FTAOD I live on on of these "modern" estates where nobody has a drive and everyone parks on the road. And I live on the second floor so running a cable out of the window isn't practical either)

tim

Reply to
tim...

Think you have to be even more careful with the claimed range of an electric car than you do with a maker's petrol MPG figures. ;-)

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Can't argue with that but this is coming from the co-inventor of lithium ion batteries so who knows...

Tim

Reply to
Tim+

Not a problem. Happy to be corrected.

The point I wanted to make was that in order to charge an electric car battery in times comparable with filling the tank with petrol, you'd need an awful lot of amps at an awful lot of volts.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

Plenty live many miles from a filling station too.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

In message , Chris Hogg writes

Did anyone else hear the piece on Radio 4 a few days ago about UPS in Birmingham?

Apparently they have converted 6 or 7 of their delivery vehicles to electric power and have been very happy with the results.

But they can't convert any more because 6 or 7 is all they can charge overnight. That uses the total supply available to their industrial site.

Reply to
Bill

Tesla claims that you can get a 50% charge in 20 minutes at one of their super-fast chargers. That sounds like around 100kW = 400 amps at 240v, which seems rather high.

Reply to
GB

Not while Trump is in charge. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

Yes, I agree with those figures. OK if you want to stop at a service station and pop in for a coffee while you wait, but at busy times there's often a queue for the normal petrol pumps, and they have a fairly rapid turnover, so what it would be like with a twenty minute wait I shudder to think.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.