Memories - old technology

Jun 22, 2017 123 Replies

DAB, being digital, has the *potential* for delivering excellent interference-free sound of CD quality. But, as with so much digital technology, everything is in the implementation - because DAB and digital TV use lossy compression, broadcasters have the choice over how far they turn down the quality in order to fit more stations into the resource that they have paid for. And (IMHO) they sometimes turn it down too far.

In the case of DAB, there is also the need to supply a good signal. If the signal deteriorates a bit below perfect, there will probably be no audible effect (whereas for analogue forms, especially those involving AM, you might get more hiss). For digital, if you decrease the signal level further (especially if there is a neighbouring signal that becomes stronger relative to the one you want) you will suddenly reach a point (the "digital cliff") at which reception falls off suddenly.

I imagine it is the sudden fall-off which causes the "bubbling mud" noise. I've never heard it because the only times I've used a DAB radio in a car, reception has been good.

FM reception near me is very poor. It may be partly that my car radio aerial is not as good as it was (cable fault or aerial pre-amp fault) but BBC stations towards the low end of the FM band (ie R4, R3 and R4) are very fluttery whereas Classic FM and BBC/commercial local stations in the middle and the top of the band are fine.

At first I thought it was RDS that was not switching to a stronger signal, but when I rescan (having stopped the car!) there *is* no stronger signal. Where I live (east of York) the strongest BBC FM is from all the way from Holme Moss, rather than from my local TV transmitter, Bilsdale, because that has a polar diagram than aims the signal northwards.

This is something that I've only noticed for the past few months, so it looks like a fault (presumably at my end) that has only recently developed.

DAB certainly suffered from being a solution to a problem the vast majority of the public didn't worry about. Especially as it arrived after being able to play your own choices of music in a car were becoming so much easier. And like any transmission system relies on an adequate signal strength.

Yup. Before condemning one transmission medium over another, you need to establish a level playing field.

I spent considerably more on a DAB, FM and AM aerial (from a local Wandsworth firm) for the old Rover than many spend on a complete ICE system. It has individual head amps for DAB and FM, With separate downleads to both. The FM and AM are combined as usual.

Other car - and the one before it - had aerials you couldn't see. In screen or whatever. And both much worse reception than with the roof aerial on the Rover, despite the BMW using diversity reception for FM.

The DAB one supplied with my aftermarket DAB radio was a horrible looking screen one which worked as well as it looked.

Oddly, I've been using a portable radio recently at home. While decorating outside. And as expected moving around beside it causes the signal to come and go on FM. With the transmitter aerial clearly visible from the top of the house - about 5 miles away.

Those who think FM a perfect system for mobile or portable use clearly have very different ears to me.

Sometimes?

IMHO it's always. There are audible artefacts on DAB, and visible ones on TV.

Andy

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required