It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "IMM" saying something like:
So, what you're saying is that this inventor has come up with a design that will allow an electric motor to actually output more energy than is put into it?
The message from "Dave Plowman (News)" contains these words:
I can't see waiting an hour for a charge ever catching on with the great majority of drivers. Even if time is not money who would want to sit around on a service station waiting for their battery to charge.
There is of course an easy way round that problem. Design the car for easy battery removal and get a battery transplant instead of a charge.
That is probably one the dumbest thing I have ever read. Take all the very heavy batteries under the seats out, and put in another set every couple of days. How dumb!!!!
_________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 120,000 groups Unlimited download
It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "IMM" saying something like:
Yes, and? Given the efficiency of electric motors is 90+% already, and the ONLY function of an eclectic motor is to convert leccy to motion... you're seriously telling us that 10% of the electrical energy could suddenly be used to make the same amount of mechanical energy as before?
Anyone with half a brain cell still intact would realise it's not possible for a 'new' electric motor to use 10% of the energy of others.
Tomorrow's World syndrome. Announce a principle like it's actually here. You have know idea whether they'll solve the intrinsic problems with Lithium Polymer technology. My guess is they won't.
He seems to have more of a clue than you do, so I would say the he does, have you never heard of the phrase "You'll have to sell that idea to the venture capitalist before they will invest in your idea" ? Thos tech' papers you keep going on about could well be someone's attempt to 'market' their theory with a hope that someone will fund research, development or production - nothing more and nothing less, it doesn't prove that they work or it's even possible.
It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "IMM" saying something like:
Quite right too. Tripe babblers should be taken out and beaten to within an inch of their lives. Up and down the country there are countless thousands of pots full of tripe on cooking stoves, continuously babbling away and filling the houses with the smell of tripe and onions.
The dumbest thing you ever read is the tripe you write. Up to now "lith poly" batteries have been light. Now they are unaccountably "very heavy". So what brought on the change?
Just for the record it would be by no means impossible to design a car in which even a heavy battery pack as used in todays environmental disasters could be in the form of a removable module that when in place gave the structure the requisite stiffness and when out still left a structure strong enough to maintain rigidity.
Another odd person. I am reporting it to the ng, as many tech journals have reported it and confident it works, some are not. I never said it works or does not work.
_________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 120,000 groups Unlimited download
Still demonstrating your complete inability to understand anything relating to numbers dIMM. You seem fond of quoting percentages for some reason but if you actually understood what they meant you wouldn't have claimed that your silly Prius put out 90% less pollution than the typical car. Likewise if you knew anything at all about electric motors you wouldn't propagate a myth about machines that, on the figures quoted, would just have to be well over 100% efficient. There is at least a rational explanation for why the dishonest and devious can get away with quoting potential efficiencies of up to 110% for gas boilers but the difference between higher and lower calorific values is not a licence to fantasize about impossible efficiencies elsewhere.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.