Can we agree...

...that T i m knows everything, is always correct in what he says and that no amount of help and information will ever persuade him otherwise.

That way we can all save time and effort in responding to his requests for information when he ignores it anyway as it does not fit with his pre- conceived ideas.

Reply to
Bev
Loading thread data ...

Nope, even he has never suggested anything along those lines? Is he intimidating you because you are so thick?

And again, other than if he says it there is a fair chance he knows it to be reasonably correct.

Ah, you seem to be confusing that with left brainers throwing their toys out of the pram when he stands up for himself. Does the fact that he has his own POV upset you then?

Oh no! I wonder how he is going to cope without *your* incitefull contributions 'Bev'?

Oh, please respect all the others here by marking your personal issues as off topic.

Cheers, T i m

p.s. You know your little post probably says more about you than you intended, 'Bev @invalid.com'. ;-(

Reply to
T i m

What a faceplant. Can't you see sarcasm when it hits you in the face?

Like trillions of animals slaughtered every year.

More abuse to save a lost argument.

You rarely respond to me. Perhaps others should follow my lead?

I'm sure her B12 levels are higher than yours.

Reply to
Fredxx

Another one mirroring now ... brilliant. They (the trolls) wouldn't have a unique idea amongst them (assuming it's not all the same troll).

O M G. You *really* are thick aren't you! (and yet more mirroring). Now I really do feel sorry for you, not only being so devoid of the most basic human understanding but stuck down that hole you are still digging and covered in my piss. Obviously I wouldn't have pissed on you if you were on fire ...

Yup. Fact. Suck it up troll.

Aww, princess, is that still all you've got. ;-(

Oh, sorry. ;-( Maybe that's because you are just a sick and twisted troll?

No, don't do that, I wouldn't have anyone to piss on and laugh at! ;-(

Brilliant. I've recently had a blood test and it came back as 'normal' (and I specifically asked for B12 etc tests because we were vegan) and you already share Bevs medical records to know that it's levels are ok? You are even assuming your B12 levels are good simply because you eat meat, when 40% of the population (who will be mainly meat eaters) are B12 deficient! But then we already know you are thick. ;-(

So, I'm (still) working from fact and you are still away with the fairies!

Cheers, T i m

p.s. If you are really upset that I don't generally reply to you, how about stopping making up BS as all the sensible people here can see straight though it and just talk normally for a change ... if you can that is?

formatting link

Reply to
T i m

It wasn't intended a a mirror, more the choice of words I knew there was a fighting chance you might just understand.

All that guff but no denial.

It's not, as well as you know, unless you include poor amoebas.

I don't need anything else when you attempt to end a losing argument through abuse.

The sick person is described by the following?

1) You are a fanatic 2) Hypocrite in terms of incarcerating your pets unbecoming of a vegan. 3) Keeping a dog in captivity, admitting you subjecting it to pain through full bladders and bowels. 4) Likely deficient in B12 5) Being an unworthy example of a vegan 6) Abusing others who disagree with you, questioning their brain 7) In denial you abuse others who disagree with you 8) Not caring for animal welfare, as indicated by the snipping of petitions and not wanting to improve slaughter procedures. 9) You believe in a deity like father christmas and endorse religious practises employed in cruel animal slaughter 10) Admit you don't want the conditions during the animal's life to be improved 11) Subject children to age restricted violence 12) Endorse the cruel force feeding of geese so you can enjoy fois gras 13) Endorse the cruel practice of caging bears for their raw bile 14) Endorse cruel blood sports

I'm saddened you laugh at animal welfare. You are sick and need help.

From being economical with the truth when it suits you I simply don't believe you.

There is a good chance I have good B12 levels. I just had a fix with a beef casserole. It was gorgeous.

We know differently. It is a narcissistic tendency to believe you have the right to speak for others.

It's a fact that more vegans are B12 deficient than meat eaters, however much you wish this not to be true.

I am talking normally, when I talk using words you understand you say I'm mirroring you. When you don't like facts I, and others, publish you resort to abuse. Those are not traits of a normal person, but of a fanatic.

You are free to have your opinion and your way of life. Why would you think otherwise?

Reply to
Fredxx

Been on my filter for ages.

T i m has a bad case of 'One True Stick'-ness. The delusion that one single personal *interpretation* of the world is, in fact, the world-in-itself, as Kant put it.

It is a condition that many vaguely intelligent people suffer from. It doesn't afflict the truly thick, because they know they are truly thick and don't pay their minds as much attention. It doesn't afflict the truly intelligent, because they realise that their worldview is, in the end, only a view.

But it afflicts the middle orders and their third rate brains alarmingly...

Hence Marxism, Socialism, Veganism, Environmentalism, Wokeism, Religious fundamentalism...

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Mine too.

Another Dave

Reply to
Another Dave

I like Tim ...

Reply to
Jim GM4DHJ ...

Because you have been a coward for ages, preferring to throw stones over the wall than face me directly. I can't blame you though, given you generally have f*ck all else.

That might be the case if it were true, but as with most things you state about me (because you are too petrified to sat 'to' me), it's complete bollox.

If we are on the subject of veganism, I am only one and was far from the first who knows our treatment of a subset of species is not only (very) bad for them (especially considering it's also completely unnecessary in most cases) but bad for us as well, as conformed by all the medial bodies, all the environmental bodies and all the animal rights bodies.

So the irony here it is you who are different, countering the common thought and direction, but such is the way for basement dwelling trolls desperate to protect their selfish way of life.

Bwhahahahaha!! OMG, if there was ever a statement of Turnip putting himself on some pedestal, that was it!

Aw bless ... and that's the best he's got unfortunately. ;-(

Strawmen.

Consideration for the animals we share this rock with and we are dependent on in many cases (for our existence, not even to consume / exploit).

Consideration for the rock we all have to share and breath the air on and drink the water from and are dependant on for our existence.

Strawmen.

Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

I expect even Bedlam got boring after a time...

Reply to
Max Demian

Awww bless, 'cowardly killfile friends' ... ;-)

It's amazing how deep people will bury their heads in the sand to avoid *the truth* (not just my truth).

But hey, the world is already a-changing and like it on not, everyone will have to change their lifestyles sooner or later, even if they want to carry on causing unnecessary death and suffering to innocent creatures.

Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

You expect or know?

Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

Have you ever thought why you might be in their killfile?

Could it be that more noise emanates from you consisting of mindless waffle and abuse than anything of substance or assistance to this group.

Reply to
Fredxx

That's a bit rich coming from you. You can never justify many aspects of the twaddle you spout and throw abuse every time you've lost your argument.

Really "conformed by all the medial bodies"?

As an aside, dieticians are quick to point out the deficiencies of a vegan diet.

Another sign you've lost the plot resorting to abuse, not the sort of thing you'd say to NP's face.

Is that agreement that you're too thick to realise you're thick?

The truth hurts.

If you had consideration for animals you would care about their welfare while they're alive, and not show an insane jealousy of us eating them when they no longer have a care in the world.

Hardly when you are the very definition of fanaticism.

Reply to
Fredxx

Are you illiterate? The poster said "expect". Is that really so difficult for you to accept?

Reply to
Fredxx

I'm thinking of the audience.

Reply to
Max Demian

I must admit to wondering why anyone would inform all about their killfile?

My guess is they have a rather over inflated view of their own importance?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News

;-)

It seems the old <plonk> seems to have gone out of fashion as well, maybe because people doing it were then called 'plonkers', like people who toss litter are now being called 'tossers'. ;-)

formatting link
Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

And taking the dog for a walk in the park is called ...

Was it you who blocked me a long time ago? If it was, I won't expect to see an answer obviously :-)

Reply to
Scott

And the same sort of person who tells us that he is going to deface his polling slip, to "make a statement". Why not just do so, and not tell us ?.

Reply to
Andrew

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.