All your fears about Smart meters confirmed

You don?t need cameras in the bathroom, just the PIR.

The problem is ensuring that they do actually wear it. And it isnt viable to have someone ring them when its clear that they arent currently wearing it either because they can just ignore the phone call.

The system checks that it can see them moving around, more than one sensor is activated over time.

Does tell you that they are moving around.

Reply to
2987fr
Loading thread data ...

A PIR can't detect one indivual from another, so would only be of use for single person use bathrooms and all it could detect is whether or not someone was in there nothing else of much use. Has the person fainted or just having a long relaxing bath or are they giving birth to a catherdral (a big crap). I know some that sepnd 10mins and even take a book in to have a crap.

How to yuo ensure peolpe wear pace makers or use walking frames ? How to yuo ensure people install PIRs all over their house and in teh garden and street and everywhere they go . How to you ebsure they install PIRs in friends and family houses and venues such as sports arenas and theatres ? and of course public toilets.

have you ever installed a PIR in a public toilet ?

So if they are having a bath or a nap on the sofa, or watching TV or reading a book, or fallen asleep while reading one of your posts ?

Which doesn't mean a lot, as people sleep and stand or sit still even while eating most are stationary to a PIR.

We have reasearch projects dealing with this sort of thing and attached things can give early warning of blood pressure and heart condition rathe rthan just a PIRs 'digital' state which is pretty useless.

Reply to
whisky-dave

snip

Usually by putting them under the skin and sewing up the wound.

Reply to
Roger Hayter

Don't you have to agree to have one fitted and agree not to try to rip it out.

No ones purt a pace maker in me, or placed PIRs all around and in my house.

Reply to
whisky-dave
[...]

NhW and a vigilant community are often so under-rated.

Round here, throughout last summer they often used a drone for a recce of the rear of the property, the choicest portable items - especially 'Apple', and to establish best entry points, the occupants' habits, and even occupancy; and then burgled having ascertained the high likelihood of no-one being at home, timed right down to a 10 to 15 minute slot.

Apparently drone-blockers are unfeasible, yet even if they were, then unlawful or illegal.

The recent snowfall was an eye-opener: 'alien' footprints around the cars during the small hours, then unidentifiables picked up by cctv.

Reply to
paul

Sure, but when there is more than one person there, you don?t need any system for detecting when someone needs help, the other people can do that when the individual can't to that for themselves.

It can certainly detect that the individual stays there forever and that is likely a good indication that they need help.

If they stay there for days its likely that they can't get out of it.

Ditto.

But even you don?t stay on the crapper for days.

You surgically implant them.

They find that they can't move around without them.

Even you don?t do that for days at time, even when in a drunken stupor.

But don?t stay in the same place for days.

Problem is getting the individual to wear it all the time.

Reply to
2987fr

My neighbours have installed a webcamera in their parents house.

Reply to
harry

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.