Air conditioning in April - good grief

In actual fact, all sorts of working from home is perfectly legal - and indeed actively encouraged - so called tele-working for instance or IT jobs. Very large varieties of work could be conducted at home and the list is growing. Government and local authorities encourage this for all sorts of sound reasons - from being better for "the family", for carers, for disabled people for parents of the very young, for part timers - as well as being often much more socially, ecologically and environmentally sound.

It's not that long ago historically when everyone effectively worked at home or from home.

In general (aside from restrictive covenants and ground leases etc) the only problems you are likely to face working from home as far as government and the law are concerend is where you will have major noise or traffic or other impact on your neighbours: Things like running a large commercial car repair shop in the street, 24 hour light engineering, a knocking shop or a retailers. But "quiet" or "indoors" type work with no local traffic impact is all perfectly legal.

There is of course CGT to consider, but that's another matter.

Reply to
Simon Gardner
Loading thread data ...

And the reason I'm working at home today is because my small son is unwell... as you say, it's better.

The knocking shop is next door, and the council were mainly concerned that they hadn't notified 'change of use'. I am NOT joking.

Reply to
Bob Eager

What did they do there before?

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

Reply to
Andy Hall

Taxi office! Was changed to a "men's heatlh club" !!!

Reply to
Bob Eager

Keep meaning to get round to setting up a local news server, but that one somehow keeps dropping to the bottom of the list. Maybe when the house is finished :-) There are many things on the "maybe when the house is finished" list...

Reply to
Grunff

I use Hamster on my spare Windows box, does a fine job as well.

Reply to
James Hart

In many cases you do. Try using your garage as a storage room for mail order as see what they say.

Reply to
IMM

So that's what he does for a living.

Reply to
Grunff

r u being sponsored m8 - your a classic !

howz your straight jacket fitting you ?

:-)

Reply to
zero

He does? I thought it was computer related.

Reply to
IMM

Have the primary schools not gone back yet then? Or are you playing truant?

Reply to
Andy Luckman (AJL Electronics)

He parents can be jailed for allowing this.

Reply to
IMM

So size of network in a house represents a commercial enterprise?

I don't think so.

If a council were in the least bit interested (and they are not) it would be issues like whether there are large numbers of trucks delivering goods or a lack of off-street parking or possibly whether there is an accompanying sweat shop.

Since the government and others is heavily encouraging lack of travel by introducing disincentives for doing so like the congestion zones and the London Underground then it would be rather hard to complain about home working. They are even pushing "broadband", but no cabinet minister knows what it is (or which day of the week it is either).

As far as delivery of packets are concerned, almost all of mine come over copper wire or microwave link, or if need be by Fedex.

This is not of interest to the council, or for that matter any of their business.

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

Reply to
Andy Hall

I would get them onto you too, because of those snakes.

Reply to
IMM

Freak summers 'will happen regularly'

Costly extremes of weather will become the norm, study suggests

Tim Radford, science editor Monday January 12, 2004 The Guardian

The 2003 heatwave in Europe that killed at least 20,000 people and triggered losses of an estimated £7bn could be a taste of things to come, according to research released today.

Climate scientists from Zurich report in Nature online that the summer heatwave that broke all records in France, Germany and central Europe had been extremely unusual, even given the steady rise in average global temperatures over the past 150 years.

Christophe Sch?r and six colleagues said this increase could not explain why European thermometers had risen so high, and stayed at the danger level for so long. But the heatwave, of the kind experienced once in 450 years, may not have been a freak.

The Swiss researchers used computer-driven weather models to determine whether climate variability - the already large difference between weather extremes - was likely to increase with average temperature and growing concentrations of greenhouse gases. In one simulation they found that, towards the end of the century, every second summer could be as hot and as dry as 2003.

"The European summer climate might experience a profound increase in year-to-year variability in response to greenhouse forcing," they wrote. "Such an increase in variability might be able to explain the unusual European summer of 2003, and would strongly affect the incidence of heatwaves and droughts in the future. It would represent a serious challenge to adaptive response strategies designed to cope with climate change."

The 10 hottest years on record have occurred since 1991, and the Zurich report is the third in less than a week to underline the climate threat.

On Thursday, scientists warned that global warming posed a danger of extinction for a million vulnerable plants and animals. On Friday the government's chief scientist, Sir David King, said climate change was a more serious threat than global terrorism. A survey of storms, droughts, heatwaves and other natural disasters in 2003 supports Sir David's argument.

According to the insurance giant Munich Re, 700 natural disasters last year claimed 50,000 lives, almost five times as many as in in 2002, and cost $60bn (£33bn). The temperatures in Germany alone between July and August were of the kind that might be expected to happen only once in Europe in

450 years. By 2020, the insurance chiefs said, such heatwaves might be happening every 20 years.

"We will have to get used to the fact that hot summers like the one we had in Europe must be expected more frequently in the future," said Gerhard Berz, the head of the company's risks research team. "It is possible that they will have become more or less the norm by the middle of the century. The summer of 2003 was a summer of the future, so to speak."

The earthquake in Iran on Boxing Day and the heatwave in Europe accounted for most of the deaths last year. But other freak events took a huge toll. In September, Hurricane Isabel destroyed 360,000 homes on the US east coast, and a series of tornadoes in May caused $3bn worth of damage.

Heatwaves in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan took temperatures up to 50C (122F). In China floods along the Huai and Yangtze rivers swept through

650,000 homes and caused more than £4bn of losses. Forest fires scorched huge areas of Australia, southwestern Europe, Canada and the US. Fires in California alone cost the insurance industry $2bn (£1.1bn).
Reply to
Simon Gardner

No excuse for obesity at all. Just insulate well. shade well and ventilate well. No need to add to global warming.

Reply to
IMM

I see. They aren't interested in herpetiles either, especially since they are non-venomous and quite small.

Therefore there is no need for you to be like the trouser variety.

.andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl

Reply to
Andy Hall

It seems this year's offerings from B&Q include the previously mentioned evaporative cooler at 49.

Also, a 179 "WA903 Mobile Air conditioner" at 8000 "BTU" - whatever that is in real money; a 298 Habicool Mobile Air Conditioner at 12000 "BTU" - again whatever that is in real money; and a smaller 248 Habicool Mobile Air Conditioner rated at 10000 "BTU" - yet again whatever that is in real money.

[If B&Q's previous daftness is continued, the unit's power consumption will be shown on the data plate in Watts and its dimensions also in SI units. Consistency ain't B&Q's strong point - presumably in order the better to bamboozle customers.]

I presume these might be "hang a hoze out the window" jobs? Anyone had a look at any of them?

Reply to
Simon Gardner

Note the word "could"

We all know how accurate those are!

But how many simulations did they run in total? I bet they don't tell us, nor what the results were.

"might"

But the record doesn't go back very far. It was just as hot in the past.

What? Natural disasters have always been a more serious threat than global terrorism. How does that support any argument about climate change?

Then again, they might not. But it's a good excuse to increase premiums.

It's also possible that they will not.

And the point of that information is?

Someone once tried to use the increasing value of insurance claims following hurricanes in the US to prove that hurricanes were getting worse, therefore global warming was causing climate change. It was, of course, a load of tosh with no account taken for the increasing numbers of people living in hurricane prone areas and the increased living standards naturally leading to higher insurance claims.

Let them burn and let nature repair itself. Attempting to keep forest areas fire free only stores up trouble.

Scientists are now saying that global warming is occuring on Mars, too. Not much human activity there so why are we so sure it's caused by human activity on Earth? I'll leave it as an exercise to determine the common factor.

MBQ

Reply to
MBQ

AFIAK 1000 BTU is equivalent to 293W.

From the BTU and wattage the efficiency ratio or COP can be calculated; COP = (BTU * 0.293)/W

cheers, Pete.

Reply to
Pete C

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.