Re: More on the Bethel fire...

Feb 13, 2008 11 Replies
Saved reading
Jump to replies (11)

On 13 Feb 2008, Pierre Levesque wrote


Not too many projects make it to Architectural Record twice in
> one year... for better or worse.
>
>
formatting link

Ummm....sorry, but that URL doesn't work.

Try this one:

formatting link

On 13 Feb 2008, Pierre Levesque wrote

Alas, same problem -- I suspect the destination URL has some wau pf blocking direct access. FWIW, here's what I get from tinyurl:

(quote) Error: Unable to find site's URL to redirect to.

Please check that the URL entered is correct. To learn more about TinyURL.com, please visit the homepage.

(/quote)

On 13 Feb 2008, Pierre Levesque wrote

Thanks for that; interesting article.

(It's very weird -- the tinyurl's working now, too. Heigh-ho; mysteries of the internet, innit...)

On 13 Feb 2008, Michael Bulatovich wrote

It's working for me, now, too -- no idea what was going on.

Yep, that's the first person I'd turn to to investigate a fire - an electrical engineer. I'd turn to a local electrician who was on the volunteer fire department first.

R

"Pierre Levesque" wrote in news:5tFsj.2774$CX2.2237@trndny09:

I'm amazed that it could even burn...!

Someone posted an interesting comment on the AR webpage:

Anonymous wrote: From these two links

formatting link
and (
formatting link
), this building looks like it was built entirely of a steel structure, metal framing, plaster interior, concrete floors, and stucco exterior.

How on earth and how could a fire become so hot as to engulf this building?

That's a question I would ask the fire officials...

2/13/2008 9:57 AM CST

Yes, less than a year. No insight about anything other than... never mind, I don't want to be associated to any opinion... Maybe some nameless source will come forward later on this weekend with a viewpoint... ;-)

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required