On 13 Feb 2008, Pierre Levesque wrote
Not too many projects make it to Architectural Record twice in
> one year... for better or worse.
>
>formatting link
Ummm....sorry, but that URL doesn't work.
Re: More on the Bethel fire...
Feb 13, 2008
11 Replies
Try this one:
formatting link
On 13 Feb 2008, Pierre Levesque wrote
Alas, same problem -- I suspect the destination URL has some wau pf blocking direct access. FWIW, here's what I get from tinyurl:
(quote) Error: Unable to find site's URL to redirect to.
Please check that the URL entered is correct. To learn more about TinyURL.com, please visit the homepage.
(/quote)
On 13 Feb 2008, Pierre Levesque wrote
Thanks for that; interesting article.
(It's very weird -- the tinyurl's working now, too. Heigh-ho; mysteries of the internet, innit...)
On 13 Feb 2008, Michael Bulatovich wrote
It's working for me, now, too -- no idea what was going on.
Yep, that's the first person I'd turn to to investigate a fire - an electrical engineer. I'd turn to a local electrician who was on the volunteer fire department first.
R"Pierre Levesque" wrote in news:5tFsj.2774$CX2.2237@trndny09:
I'm amazed that it could even burn...!
Someone posted an interesting comment on the AR webpage:
Anonymous wrote: From these two links
formatting link
and (
formatting link
this building looks like it was built entirely of a steel structure, metal framing, plaster interior, concrete floors, and stucco exterior.
How on earth and how could a fire become so hot as to engulf this building?
That's a question I would ask the fire officials...
2/13/2008 9:57 AM CST
Yes, less than a year. No insight about anything other than... never mind, I don't want to be associated to any opinion... Maybe some nameless source will come forward later on this weekend with a viewpoint... ;-)
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required