Frank Boettcher wrote: ...
And, if you'll recall, I've repeatedly agreed I don't think biofuels in general (and ethanol in particular) are "the" answer, either. I do think there's a role in a transition that is useful, however.
Given the political realities, doesn't appear as though there's sufficient political will to yet allow for new exploration in many of the currently off-limit places and even if that were to change now, it wouldn't have an effect on production for quite some time. It also doesn't do anything to improve/increase the refining capacity which, while it has grown owing to expansion efforts, is still a bottleneck. Meanwhile, if it can coincidentally pump some life into the farm economies of the central plains, that can only be, imo, _a_good_thing_ (tm).
If you're referral is to the CE "standard design" they named that, then yes, there's (yet another) place we went far wrong way back when, along with Jimmy pulling the plug on the CRBRP and stopping NRC licensing review for the proposed GE-built/financed commercial fuel reprocessing facility at Barnwell.
It _is_, otoh, heartening to note that TVA/NuStart have actually filed a formal licensing application for a new unit at the Bellefonte site in N AL (about three weeks ago, now). Of course, it's more than a little disheartening that the Bellefonte I unit sits there over 90% complete, abandoned in situ since the late 80s/early 90s along w/ the roughly 850 MWe that Rancho Seco could have been producing in CA if not for the ill-considered plebiscite orchestrated by the same groups.
Coincidentally to your energy-related background, in a former life I was NE for B&W NPGD Lynchburg. I came back to farm after 30-something years mostly generation-related engineering last 10 or so mostly for the fossil utilities at the EPRI I&C Center located at Kingston Fossil.
--