This is the email response that I received from Craig Stone, Director of Marketing, Franklin International (Titebond) concerning the Wood Magazine glue test. I also responded to his email that "some of us" were concerned about the actual differences or advantages of TB3 over TB2. I requested an explanation of how or why TB3 is labeled Water Proof when the Common Knowledge Definition of Water Proof is so vastly different. I will share those answers when they come.
Mr. Bridges,
Thank you for your note on Friday regarding the Wood Magazine article on wood glues. We first viewed the information Friday afternoon, and we as an organization are shocked, disappointed and concerned about the results contained in this article. Although I cannot get into the specifics right now, we have communicated our feelings to the appropriate personnel and plan to pursue a very aggressive action plan to refute the results and ensure that all woodworkers know the capabilities of not only Titebond III, but all of our woodworking glues.
Titebond is the preferred brand of professionals more than 3 to 1 over our leading competitor, and this is due to performance, reliability and consistency over a 70-year period. We perform 3rd party, independent testing on all of our products, and our wood glues have continually outperformed all other competitors...Titebond III passed Type I water-resistance and many of the polyurethanes did NOT pass the same test. In addition, ASTM standard testing continually indicates our products to have much higher strength numbers. How did the article reach their final results? We are not sure...but we are going to find out.
In contrast to this article, Titebond III has received excellent reviews from other woodworking publications, and initial sales (as well as repeat use) is as strong as we have seen with any Titebond product. Again, thanks for your interest...if you have any additional questions, please forward them to my attention.
Craig Stone Director of Marketing Franklin International (Titebond)
800-877-4583