: > And you'll have no blade guard, unless you buy (or build) an over-arm guard of : > some sort. : >
: > Seems to me that your plan combines the disadvantages of both setups, with few : > (if any) of the advantages of either. : : Yeah, I suppose that's true - I was looking at this as a slightly : better option than nothing at all. Most blade guard/splitters on new : saws are such crap that they are not worth using (yes, that's : debatable, and I wasn't looking to start that discussion...) Maybe I'd : be better to phrase this as taking a splitter that would otherwise : never get used, and reducing it to something smaller/more elegant that : would still serve to prevent a workpiece from pinching behind the : blade. A better, although not free, implementation of this would be : one of the table inserts that has a small splitter. : : Lately, I've been seeing a bunch of saws that have a 'riving knife', : but one that does not move up/down along with the blade. From what : I've read, new model saws are going to be required to have a riving : knife in order to get UL listing. I wonder if the fixed position : knives are an inexpensive way to comply with the new UL regulation.
If it's "fixed position", then it's not a riving knife and shouldn't meet UL, or anyone else's, standards for the way a riving knife is supposed to work.
Len