Two issues of concern:
1) The table top is about 11' 9" long. One end is 31" wide and the other
end is 35" wide. As is, the table looks odd (though not so in the pics), b
eing too narrow looking. I think it needs to be wider and I do have more
boards, to widen the table top. Also, the leg units are 48" wide, so the "
feet" stick out well beyond the table top sides.... that looks awkward, too
. A wider table top would make things look much better. Question: What
might be an optimum width for this length of table top, for it to look app
2) One leg unit was checked from the start and is more noticeable in these
pics, i.e., after it has been planed and sanded with 80 grit, a better vi
ew of the check. The leg unit is pretty darn stable, doesn't flex along t
he check, but that might not last forever. The leg is 3.5" thick. I thin
k, but not sure yet, I can have it sawn along the check, at a local pro woo
d shop, then glue it back together, with a long tenon running the length of
the cut face. I wonder how well I can clamp it, though, having uneven edg
es for the clamp faces to press against. This check is really unsightly a
nd I would like to remove it, despite the unit being stable, but I'm not su
re if I can glue things back together and it be as stable as it seems to be
, now. Question: Would you cut the check out? Any glue & clamp advice
would be appreciated, also. I do have adequate hefty bar clamps for this s
First 5 Pics: https://www.flickr.com/photos/43836144@N04/?details=1
Additional comments: In person, the table really looks rustic, as is. Rem
inds me of something the vikings or midevil folks would sit around, big and
bulky raw furniture. I wasn't expecting it to have this look to it and I
like this appearance. I wonder if a finish coat will remove this midevil-
like look. If this look remains, I can see a long matching bench seat, or
two, to accompany it. I have the rootball stock for bench legs.
Thanks for any help.
It looks nice. I would not be concerned with cracks on a table like this.
They only add to its authenticity. If it gets bad, you can always put in a
dutchman. I have seen that done on big slab tables like this. As for
finish, there are folks who do this sort of thing all the time and sell
their tables to the public. What do they do? Might want to check out their
products and copy them. The table is powerful enough visually, any kind of
finish that shows the wood will be fine. Just don't paint it!! ;-)
As for the look, the more you can add to the set with a similar theme, the
better. This is unique enough, go for it and make more things like this.
It will almost overwhelming to the senses to see a complete set. I have
seen sets like that and helped work on a few. People really respond to this
sort of thing.
I worked for a short while for a guy who would go out to the beach and
collect driftwood stumps of all sizes. He made them into tables and other
furniture. He got top dollar and people loved them.
Just some random thoughts here.
First, the table looks odd because almost all dining room tables land in th
e vicinity of 36" in width. Sure, a bit one way or another, but certainly
not on something that long. I would think that something that long and tha
t rustic would even be better if it were around the 40" mark in width.
Unless you want a tripping hazard, get the legs in under the table somewhat
. You might get used to the legs sticking out from the perimeter of the to
p, but your guests won't. It will fool your eye to see the edge of the tab
le, then not notice the legs sticking further out onto the floor. I think y
ou should take a minute put into Sketchup and see how it looks in perspecti
ve, or even just draw it out. I don't recall seeing tables that have legs
that extend beyond the top, but surely someone here can Google one up for t
he sake of argument.
As far as the cracks go, cracks that large can cause a nuisance. Large rus
tic type tables, benches and chairs made from mesquite are popular here in
South Texas and have been for a while. It is nearly impossible to find mes
quite that isn't cracked, or more commonly had "wind shake" which looks lik
e a check or a crack but is actually fiber separation. These separations c
an be several feet long and up to 3/4" of an inch wide, although most are s
You could kill two birds with one stone if you fill the cracks you have wit
h epoxy. I colored the stuff I used (West Systems) with laser printer tone
r to get it black after I mixed the two parts of epoxy, then poured the mix
into the cracks. I did a lot of that when wood turning, and it looked pre
tty neat. Sold all that stuff as mesquite was red hot for a while, or I wo
uld get you a pic. I helped a friend of mine for a while that made mesquit
e table tops and then fastened them onto wrought iron bases. We took the me
squite, put some backing rod in the crack (so the epoxy wouldn't run out an
d eventually it would stop sinking down without pouring a gallon a crack in
) and filled away. The black epoxy maintained the rustic look of the crack
, but also prevented the crack from spreading.
If you go the epoxy route, the manufacturers of two different epoxy product
s told us that when used as filler, we shouldn't skimp as opposed to using
it as an adhesive where less is more. We used it on small cracks though, a
nd didn't have problems. Also, we filled a couple of large cracks a week t
hat screwed us up and the epoxy would have fallen below the surface of the
wood instead of keeping a slight over fill. The good thing about that is y
ou can simply pour more epoxy on top and if it is a fresh pour from the day
before and perfectly clean the epoxy will adhere very well.
I think for epoxy work of this type, I would look to Lew H here on the wrec
k to get his opinion. He knows more about that than anyone I know from yea
rs of practical experience.
Width depends somewhat on function. Is it a dining table? Conference table?
Both vary considerably. Common dining table widths are 36, 40, 42 & 44, up
to about 48" which is about the max reach to center from either side.
Considering just appearance, the length/width ratio doesn't look bad to me
as is. In person, maybe it would. To my eye, a 1:4 ratio is attractive.
As Robert mentioned, the wider legs invite tripping. Widening the top would
mitigate that as would chairs or benches. If it were me, I'd also round
over the point at the outside corner...my wife tends to bump into stuff and
I'd rather she bruise herself on something round than pointy :)
If you do cut it, epoxy is the way to go for glue, no to minimal clamping
necessary. If you used yellow glue you have one good clamp point at the
apex of the down curve on each side; for other bar clamps you could use "C"
clamps or hand screws along the edges to help keep the bar clamps from
If it were me, I'd do what Robert suggested...fill it with epoxy. Don't
think I'd use black, though, even though I like black. The check has been
there long enough that it has some decomposition; if I were filling, I'd use
a stiff bristle brush to remove what is easily removeable before filling.
If you fill and don't like it you can still cut.
I am torn. I understand about the raw look...it can be quite attractive,
particularly after it has aged a while. OTOH, I LOVE the color and grain of
finished walnut. Conclusion: no opinion :(
Built a number of tables, including a few trestles. My experience, as
far as dimensions which are necessary for a comfortable and stable
trestle, as follows:
~ 30" height is fine for dining.
~ 40" to 43" wide is the sweet spot for dining with formal place
settings (including glassware), with serving dishes in the middle.
Anything below 40" wide tends to be crowded for seated guests serving
themselves from the middle of the table.
My favorite width is no less than 43" if space allows.
~ Leave an absolute minimum of 11" for leg room, from each _end_ of the
table top, to the trestle structure and footprint itself. 12" is good;
since you really don't gain that much from more, aesthetics can come in
to play at that point.
~ Stability and safety: For a stable base at the foot, make the
footprint width, centered on the table top, 7 to 8" less on each side of
the table top.
IOW, if your table top is 43" wide, make your trestle footprint width
+/-28" wide, and centered on the tabletop, thusly:
All good advice and certainly appreciated. I've reread all your posts and
have several leads, as to what to do, and I think each suggestion can be mo
dified, as I proceed, if need be.
This will be a dining table for the pending camp/retreat, to be built at th
e farm. The camp will be more of a large vacation home/hunting camp, not
a small structure by any means. The tree was growing on the chosen const
ruction site, so the idea was to make a table from the tree that came from
its original site. The dining room will definitely be large enough for t
his size/length of table. Any dining will likely be of a general atmosphe
re and that of a hunting group, that sort of setting, more so. I doubt ver
y much formal dining will take place at the camp, but the general setting a
nd retreat home, itself, will have some elegance to it.
I like the suggestion of using epoxy as a filler, which can be cut out if i
t doesn't work or doesn't look the best. It never occurred to me to use e
poxy as a filler, rather than my cut & glue option.
The leg units' widths can accommodate some trimming, maybe 3"-4" each side,
but I like their wide appearance and their bold look, especially for this
length of table. I'll trim an inch or 2, at a time, and evaluate the appea
rance, as I go. Yep, no one is likely to know that they have been trimmed
from their original width, especially if the rest of the whole's appearance
diverts one's eye elsewhere.... and additional benches or other seating wi
ll add to the whole.
I'll add 10" to the table top width, re-evaluate the look and make adjustme
nts if need be. In the camp setting, a slightly wider table top, than nor
mal, may not be so awkward. The leg units' spacing look good/appropriate
at 2' from the ends of the table top. That would put the leg units about
7' apart. A wider table top would accommodate some camp/hunting decor acce
ssory item(s), also, and not be strictly for dining/food containers, during
meals, only. I suspect the optimum concern is that the table top width b
e narrow enough that one can still reach across the table and pass-a-slap t
o a sassy nephew, or such!
Thanks again, great advice and I'll keep you posted as to the progress.
> Swingman and All:
All good advice and certainly appreciated. I've reread all your posts
and have several leads, as to what to do, and I think each suggestion
can be modified, as I proceed, if need be.
This will be a dining table for the pending camp/retreat, to be built
at the farm. The camp will be more of a large vacation home/hunting
camp, not a small structure by any means. The tree was growing on
the chosen construction site, so the idea was to make a table from the
tree that came from its original site. The dining room will
definitely be large enough for this size/length of table. Any dining
will likely be of a general atmosphere and that of a hunting group,
that sort of setting, more so. I doubt very much formal dining will
take place at the camp, but the general setting and retreat home,
itself, will have some elegance to it.
I like the suggestion of using epoxy as a filler, which can be cut out
if it doesn't work or doesn't look the best. It never occurred to me
to use epoxy as a filler, rather than my cut & glue option.
I like 48" wide tables, thus if you go that route you will have to
To glue heavy boards together, you are going to need glue with a long
time which means epoxy with a slow hardener.
You already have info from System3 epoxy from another job, they can
supply the black pigment compatible with epoxy.
If you proceed to fill cracks with black epoxy, approach it the same
a dentist fills a tooth.
Use a wire brush to remove all traces of rot before filling with
If cracks are all the way thru the wood, get back to me for additional
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 1:35:51 PM UTC-5, Lew Hodgett wrote:
Yeah, I might can see through in some areas. I'll re-evaluate everything this evening and post an update (late tomorrow?).
Another concern, I thought of: The wood is still green, inside. The slab will take a few more years to air dry completely. I sent System3 an email, asking about applying epoxy to green wood. I likely won't get a reply until tomorrow.
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:29:22 PM UTC-5, Sonny wrote:
g this evening and post an update (late tomorrow?).
Some of the wood we filled with epoxy was cracked all the way through. In
some cases, we simply put a tape over the crack on one side if it wasn't a
really thick board. But on the thick wood used for tops (about 2 to 2 1/2
inches) we were using <literally> gallons. Lew can give you the right back
er rod to fill the cracks as needed so you don't use so much epoxy material
. We used all kinds of materials, from soft cotton rope to closed cell foa
m rope used to back caulking.
ab will take a few more years to air dry completely. I sent System3 an ema
il, asking about applying epoxy to green wood.
Personally speaking (that means your mileage may vary) I wouldn't worry abo
ut gluing up that kind of rough wood. Fine furniture with precision cut mo
ldings and joinery requires your material be completely stable. We epoxied
the completely green tops with (again, get with Lew for the correct epoxy
to use on damp surfaces)a product made by Bob Smith industries that makes e
poxy for several different labels. The green wood moved of course, but the
since their were no molding joints to separate or move, no drawers to bind
or anything else, you didn't really see it. These were rough saw tops wit
h one side smoothed, but open on both sides so the wood moved the same amou
nt top and bottom. IF, IF, there was separation it was never at the epoxy j
oints as they were stronger than the wood so they didn't open up.
That's my experience.
Love to hear what you do. BTW, the reason I always used black on the crack
s and wind shakes was that I could never match the color without it looking
tacky. So keeping it black made it a "feature" and it looked much better.
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:12:12 AM UTC-5, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
n some cases, we simply put a tape over the crack on one side if it wasn't
a really thick board. But on the thick wood used for tops (about 2 to 2 1/
2 inches) we were using <literally> gallons. Lew can give you the right ba
cker rod to fill the cracks as needed so you don't use so much epoxy materi
al. We used all kinds of materials, from soft cotton rope to closed cell f
oam rope used to back caulking.
I can't see through any of the cracks, after all. I flattened a plastic s
traw and tried to push, wriggle, prod it through in several places and from
both sides. The straw didn't go through anywhere. It penetrated about 1"
on one side and about 2" on the other side, along a 6" length of crack and
that was all the penetration the straw would go.
I doubt the whole crack equals a measure similar to .25" X 20" X 3", but ba
sed on those figures, it would take 8.5 fluid oz to fill the crack. The sp
ace is probably half, or less, that volume. That's not much volume, nor wo
uld be much cost, based on System3's Gel Magic epoxy.
I prepped another tabletop board. It has a defected end, so the length of t
he tabletop will have to be trimmed to 10' 9". The width is now 46", which
can be narrowed more, if need be. Later this evening, I'll trim the leg
units' foot prints to about 42" and see what it looks like. Will load new
pics this evening.
System3 recommends their epoxy not be used on green or wet wood. I suppos
e I'll have to figure out something else to, maybe end up cutting the crack
out and gluing, unless I wait until it dries. I'm wondering, since the i
nside of the crack has strands of split wood and other "entrapments", the e
poxy may/will do the job, despite the wood being green or wet.
Updated pics are available, with 3 boards for the top. https://www.flickr .
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 8:22:20 PM UTC-5, Sonny wrote:
ose I'll have to figure out something else to, maybe end up cutting the cra
ck out and gluing, unless I wait until it dries. I'm wondering, since the
inside of the crack has strands of split wood and other "entrapments", the
epoxy may/will do the job, despite the wood being green or wet.
Time to shift gears. Most folks have absolutely no idea how many different
types of epoxies there are to choose from and how sophisticated this adhes
ive really is today. They have an epoxy for just about anything these days
. About 15 years ago, I reinstalled about 250' of 30" long 6"X6" limestone
coping blocks (a fancy cap) back on top of a limestone masonry wall using
a marine grade epoxy that was formulated for wet surfaces.
Every cell in my brain told me it wouldn't work, but I got it from a friend
of mine in the concrete supply field that sold industrial caulks and adhes
ives for specialty applications and repair. I decided to trust him. Not o
nly did it work, it worked very well. One hour set up time and I applied i
t to damp (pretty clean) smooth stone. Everything in my background of const
ruction told me that nothing would stick to a wet surface, but this stuff w
as made for the marine industry, and it adhered VERY well.
It was somewhere in this family of products, no doubt:
On Friday, June 27, 2014 3:48:07 AM UTC-5, nailsh...
Thanks Robert. Yeah, I should have realized there should be more options available. I still have lots of other work to do on this project, so the time will allow for the units to dry a little more.
I've been anxious for some "assembled" results, to get some idea of what things may end up looking like. No need to rush the work, especially since I have only one set of nice leg units (no replacements) to work with.
On Friday, June 27, 2014 5:37:24 PM UTC-5, Swingman wrote:
A long-time engineer friend, Tony, who has volunteered some free time to he
lp design the camp, saw the pics and wants to come take a look at the table
. Even unfinished, I'm already feeling good about this project.... and r
eally appreciating all the help I've been getting from all of you.
The present tabletop boards are 2" thick. I have 2 other nice boards, wid
er than the present ones, that are 1.5" thick. I may put these on top and
see what they look like, compare the two sets. Those leg units can stand
some good trimming. *I might can make a trip to Morganza, the Miss. Riv
er floodway locks, there, and search for another walnut rootball.... make a
nother table with the 2 sets of tabletop boards.
I wouldn't worry about any "entrapments", they just get encapsulated. Do
brush out as much as possible any visual rot but, again, any that remains
will be encapsulated and you should be able to remove enough of the visible
that the filler retains a good bond.
Can't speak about the green but if it has been cut for a year or more I
wouldn't worry about it.
The table looks much better wider, still don't like the down angle at one
end of one of the foot slabs.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.