Re: For the avoidance of doubt totally and utterly off topic
Oct 28, 2021
Last reply: 4 years ago
47 Replies
Follow replies to this discussion?
[Spam content removed by the moderators]
Information here may be outdated?
None of these should be interefered with except libel.
And BTW most of what you say is abusive, hypocritical, downright false, in bad taste, corrupt, offensive, dangerously misinformative. IMO.
[Spam content removed by the moderators]
[Spam content removed by the moderators]
Where is your *EVIDENCE* for this assertion?
[Spam content removed by the moderators]
Thank you both for proving my point that you have no idea how to conduct adult rational debate.
What *EVIDENCE* does anyone *NEED* in order to express their *OPINION*?
Because in its absence their opinion just remains a worthless piece of irrational and ineffective bolshing.
That's your *OPINION*, is it?
Where is your *EVIDENCE* for that assertion?
See the posts of the person originally reported to the police, and the self-contradictions that I've pointed out in Tim Streater's.
So no *EVIDENCE* at all.
If you can't accept that contradicting one's self is a failure of logical argument, then really there's not much point in arguing with you, as indeed there usually isn't, because logical argument is not one of your noted abilities.
That's your *OPINION*, for which you provide no *EVIDENCE* at all.
As *USUAL*.
For you, your mere unsupported *ASSERTION* is all the evidence which you say could *POSSIBLY* be *NEEDED*.
[Spam content removed by the moderators]
FFS, didn't you learn *ANYTHING* at school? It's one of the founding precepts of logical reasoning that any pair of contradicting statements cannot both be true at the same time.
formatting link
Your question doesn't seem to follow logically from what I said above, I suggest you reread it.
I have, I take it you disapprove "righties consider they have a right" to give their opinion.
And since you tell bigoted lies, my post is quite logical.
That's *EXACTLY* why I *NEVER* give any *CREDENCE* to *YOUR* statements.
Except that I haven't contradicted myself in this thread, and rarely do so in others, so your reasons for not giving me credence must lie elsewhere.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required