Yes, we just laughed (again) at poor old JJ and his rigid, explexible, linear, mind with its lack of understanding of subtlety and nuance.
Yes, we just laughed (again) at poor old JJ and his rigid, explexible, linear, mind with its lack of understanding of subtlety and nuance.
So, just as I thought, there wasn't one.
No, but you certainly continue them, thereby increasing the noise level in these groups.
I don't deny that, for the reason already explained, that if lies are allowed to go unchallenged on social media, by their very prevalence and the fact they go unchallenged they can come to be accepted as truth, so black becomes 'white' and white becomes 'black'. So I think it's important to debunk them, no matter how often they are repeated. The problem is that there are those that keep repeating them ad nauseam.
Quite, that is why I describe you as a bigot, since views you don't agree with you claim to be bigotry, when in reality they are merely opinions.
Perhaps if you were more accepting of other's opinions you might not attract so much hostility.
No, the ones I attack are either unsubstantiated claims or downright lies. Why do you think those who expressing opinions in public that they can't ever substantiate shouldn't suffer the consequences of it? How else are they ever going to learn that they need to raise their level of debate?
Perhaps if others would learn to base their opinions on solid grounds they wouldn't attract so much hostility.
Yes. we have a right to hold them, but not force others to hold them.
Oh true. But JJ and others of his ilk have a problem with that.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required