Prescott...

Good point. Probably how he'll weasel out of it. I think TT said he left the office, ostensibly to work, then called her to bring some papers he'd 'forgotten'. By his own admission (!) he'd be working...

(can't complain; I have a very flexible job but can't afford women like her!)

Reply to
Bob Eager
Loading thread data ...

Why are you defending him?

Reply to
Andy Hall

Hardly. I'm in a different country.

Reply to
Andy Hall

Matt, more like a differnt planet.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

No law against shagging.

A non-story. Boy you are dumb.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

Jealous eh!

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

He figures if fatty two jabs can get laid there might even be hope for him!

Reply to
John Rumm

Because it is none of our business at all. All he has done no wrong except have a shag with a consenting shagger. That is nothing to attack. A non-story. No worth talking about. It is like talking about Johnny tying up his shoe laces.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

On Mon, 8 May 2006 21:53:01 +0100, Doctor Drivel wrote (in article ):

If it weren't in a workplace and in employer's time it would be less of an issue. It would also be less of an issue if he hadn't taken a position of moral high ground when politicians of other parties did similar things.

Unfortunately neither is true and his position is indefensible. He now has no department and no serious responsibility. In essence, he is nothing more than a burden on the taxpayer.

:andy

Reply to
Andy Hall

2 Jags is dribble's role model. Dribble would love to look and behave like him?
Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Maybe dribble fears that he may be a 2 jags' love child

Reply to
Paul Herber

More likely an unloved child.

Owain

Reply to
Owain

Johnny had a shag - that's all. None of our business.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

Pity he didn't inherit his better characteristics.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Only in Drivel's dreams.

His only reason to own an SDS is to chisel himself out of bed in the morning.

Cheers

Tim

Reply to
Tim S

I'm sure he will be listening to his Val Doonigan and Peters and Lee LPs later. That will be good for him.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

On Tue, 9 May 2006 14:34:47 +0100, Doctor Drivel wrote (in article ):

OK.. So if he makes any moralistic pronunciations in the future, we can take it that you'll condemn him, and equally if anybody from the opposition benches does anything similar, you will not criticise them in any way?

Reply to
Andy Hall

Matt, that right...Johnny had a shag - that's all. None of our business.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

He himself has admitted that he "acted stupidly". You tell him he's wrong, 'cos no-one else is about to.

Reply to
Chris Bacon

Still nothing to do with us. His business. If Johnny wants a stupid shag then thats his business, not ours.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.