Prescott...

May 05, 2006 174 Replies

Good point. Probably how he'll weasel out of it. I think TT said he left the office, ostensibly to work, then called her to bring some papers he'd 'forgotten'. By his own admission (!) he'd be working...

(can't complain; I have a very flexible job but can't afford women like her!)

Why are you defending him?

Hardly. I'm in a different country.

Matt, more like a differnt planet.

No law against shagging.

A non-story. Boy you are dumb.

He figures if fatty two jabs can get laid there might even be hope for him!

Because it is none of our business at all. All he has done no wrong except have a shag with a consenting shagger. That is nothing to attack. A non-story. No worth talking about. It is like talking about Johnny tying up his shoe laces.

On Mon, 8 May 2006 21:53:01 +0100, Doctor Drivel wrote (in article ):

If it weren't in a workplace and in employer's time it would be less of an issue. It would also be less of an issue if he hadn't taken a position of moral high ground when politicians of other parties did similar things.

Unfortunately neither is true and his position is indefensible. He now has no department and no serious responsibility. In essence, he is nothing more than a burden on the taxpayer.

:andy

2 Jags is dribble's role model. Dribble would love to look and behave like him?

Maybe dribble fears that he may be a 2 jags' love child

More likely an unloved child.

Owain

Johnny had a shag - that's all. None of our business.

Pity he didn't inherit his better characteristics.

Only in Drivel's dreams.

His only reason to own an SDS is to chisel himself out of bed in the morning.

Cheers

Tim

I'm sure he will be listening to his Val Doonigan and Peters and Lee LPs later. That will be good for him.

On Tue, 9 May 2006 14:34:47 +0100, Doctor Drivel wrote (in article ):

OK.. So if he makes any moralistic pronunciations in the future, we can take it that you'll condemn him, and equally if anybody from the opposition benches does anything similar, you will not criticise them in any way?

Matt, that right...Johnny had a shag - that's all. None of our business.

He himself has admitted that he "acted stupidly". You tell him he's wrong, 'cos no-one else is about to.

Still nothing to do with us. His business. If Johnny wants a stupid shag then thats his business, not ours.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required