OT Spitfire and the BBC reporting

Sorry to be another one to have to correct you. The Lancaster is not a big plane at all. It is quite tiny when you see it on the ground. The Battle of Britain Memorial flight were frequent visitors at the site I used to work at and I would say that it was not much longer than a Tornado ADV. Higher at the front, but much lower at the back, due to its back to front tricycle undercarriage. It had a wider wing span, but that does not make it a bigger aircraft.

The skin panels looked very much like a well patched up aircraft that had been in the wars, but if I remember rightly, this one never saw active service in WWII. But I will stand corrected, if anyone can tell me otherwise.

Many years ago, we had a German working party on site and the boss got wind of the arrival of the B.o.B. memorial flight's arrival. As we all looked out to the East for it, as soon as the first plane came into view (the Lancaster) he turned on his heels to let the rest of the Germans know that the flight was arriving. One wag turned round and shouted 'Look, the buggers are still s**t scared of them'.

Dave

Reply to
Dave
Loading thread data ...

I thought that you were just a plumber/plonker.

I worked in the aerospace industry for over a quarter of a century. What do you know about airyplanes then?

Already you are out of your depth :-)

Dave

Reply to
Dave

formatting link
Rules of the Air Regulations 1996

Low flying 5.?(1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (2) and (3):

(a) an aircraft other than a helicopter shall not fly over any congested area of a city, town or settlement below: .........

(ii) a height of 1500 feet above the highest fixed object within 600 metres of the aircraft: whichever is the higher;

...... (e) an aircraft shall not fly closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure..

Reply to
Matt

The message from Matt contains these words:

You might point that out to the tit who does aerobatics over Ironbridge for hours on end on nice summer afternoons.

Reply to
Guy King

True. This man is a plantpot.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

Lord Hall, they would if they could afford it.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

It looks big in the air. Probabaly because it has wide wings.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

PatnDave, you know what thought, thought.

More than Lord Hall. I used to commission ILS systems and TACAN in the Middle East. I f*****g hate airyplanes.

I would like to keep it that way, but alas I know more than you PatnDave..as always.

Reply to
Doctor Drivel

In message , Buzby writes

That's Alain de Cadenet, pilot, racing driver and father of Amanda, one of those women who are famous for being famous. Don't know who the pilot of the Spitfire is, though.

Reply to
Peter Twydell

In message , Guy King writes

It wasn't the windows that the passengers looked through, it was one of the square windows in the cabin roof for the ADF (automatic direction finding) equipment.

Reply to
Peter Twydell

Even more awesome when you realise they made all that noise *without* afterburners (or reheat, as we would have called it then), as Vulcans didn't have them. A lot of noise these days comes from the Tornado and the Typhoon, but IMHO the real blaster is the B-1, known as the Bone (geddit?)

Reply to
Peter Twydell

In message , Grimly Curmudgeon writes

Not really. It ran smoothly, and the Allison-engined Mustangs were very fast at low altitude. The problem was that the engine lacked a good supercharger, which meant that the performance dropped off significantly at combat altitude in Europe. The V-1710 was fitted with a turbosupercharger in the Lockheed P-38 Lightning and was successful there. The Mustang was transformed by fitting a Merlin engine with a

2-stage 2-speed supercharger, the same as in the Spitfire Mk IX and others.
Reply to
Peter Twydell

Slightly preferable to the tail falling off.... (remember 'No Highway'?)

Reply to
Bob Eager

Ermm ... minor quibble ... the QRA (Quick Reaction Aircraft) would have been scrambled _before_ the inbound ICBMs 'hit' - to drop their payload of 'nukes' on ????? long after the demise of the UK (and/or the 'Home Service' [aka Radio4) had stopped transmitting.

I was privileged to attend the RAF's Fiftieth Birthday 'Parade'/Review .... the paddock in which I was corralled was a long way from the Royal Enclosure :). Anyway; the 'Parade' consisted of a _very_ low level flypast of RAF/RFC/RNAS aircraft in chronological order. The wave upon wave of Vulcans that 'passed before The Queen' was truly awesome and the ground did literally shake!

Reply to
Brian Sharrock

A few years ago I was driving past the (then) RAF Manston airport, on a Saturday. They were due to have an air show on the following day.

It was a nice day, and I had the windows and sunroof open. The road runs about a metre from the perimeter fence. I was looking at the road.

I didn't notice the Harrier getting ready to do a vertical take-off literally just the other side of the fence. Well, not until I nearly left the road! It was a bit noisy...

Reply to
Bob Eager

A brilliant book by one of my favourite authors.Wish I hadn't lent it to someone:-(

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher

Even just one Vulcan taking off isawesome.

One is being restored to fly again.

We're members of the support group.

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher

It depends on what you're comparing it with.

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher

Ok, Ok, I was only 6! (Still *bloody* noisy though)!

David

Reply to
Lobster

The recently departed Mark Hannah

Reply to
Buzby

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.