- posted
4 years ago
OT SF6 Very interesting topic.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
SF6 was introduced as a safer alternative to PCBs.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
And this was discussed 10 years ago. Not sure why the BBC have suddenly 'discovered' a problem.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Because its a massively nasty greenhouse gas, allegedly.
Another hollow laugh moment: Gas, as you know, per kWh, emits less CO2 than coal.
At the point of burning.
It transpires that from well to burn the methane loss into the atmosphere makes it as bad as coal overall in GHG terms
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
I assume that's a rhetorical question?
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
I'd say *not* an interesting topic. It would have been interesting if they had explored the many benefits of SF6, and how they stacked up about the supposed costs. But that is modern journalism for you.
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
If I read
#Paul
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
Quite. According to
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
From the perspective of the grid and distribution networks it leads to much more compact switchgear, less land area, massively extended maintenance intervals, higher reliability, no possibility of oil leaks, no need for oil containment and oil in water management, no need for air compressors and a massively reduced possibility of catastrophic switchgear failure.
First large scale install in the UK was mid 70's at a site on the Sheffield
275kV ringFor the UK there has been stringent management in terms of filling, leak detection and gas recovery for many decades.
Touching a 400kV metalclad busbar casing with the live conductor just 100mm beyond your fingertips is possible. It's no more than an earthed bit of pipework.
--
- Vote on answer
- posted
4 years ago
That's what I love about this group. It's sometimes even better at answering arcane questions than Google!
:-)
(Spent my 50 years on the generation side, had very little to do with transmission).