OT National Trust Properties with Slave trade links.

Sep 24, 2020 Last reply: 6 years ago 147 Replies
Saved reading

Well most of your posts are treated like jokes, like the suggestion that a meat eaters licence would improve animal welfare.

A sensible and reasonable person wouldn't joke about animal welfare.

I never thought thinking was something you enjoyed.

Admitted what precisely? That I like eating meat?

So what you're saying is you don't want to believe I campaign for improved animal welfare.

That's a very sad reflection of you.

Yet I doubt you feel any embarrassment for doing SFA for animal welfare, claiming you're doing your bit through the banning of farmed animals, with the exception of chickens of course.

Such a claim only becomes relevant for when that becomes remotely feasible. That isn't going to happen for a century or more.

It certainly doesn't say no.

Nor does this.

<snip>

Only by the psychopaths.

Basic supply and demand, even a thick troll like you should be able to understand that? Reduce demand, that reduces supply, less suffering.

Then stop treating animals like nothing, like they were just there for you to kill because you like how they taste.

What right do you think you have to take the life of an innocent animal, irrespective of the reason?

There is nothing so sad or disrespectful than what *you* do to them, especially giving you both admit that that's *why* you kill them (you like how they taste) but then try to cover up all their pain and suffering with your pathetic denial.

I think you are actually 15 years old and think the chicken nuggets mommy cooks you come from a tree.

Maybe it's just as well you don't watch the videos exposing you to the truth and facts, it would probably flip you further over the edge.

Why are you still here trying to prove black is white? You know killing living beings is wrong, especially when it's just for your pleasure, why can't you have the balls to admit that is what it is?

So, boy, man or just troll?

Cheers, T i m

I didn't snip anything that confirmed I was against veganism, however hard you wish I did.

Not sure what that is about apart from demonstrating a deficiency in B12.

Yup, because even if you are, you have no idea what you are doing.

And a worse one on you, given you are the one causing all the pain, death and suffering in the first place.

Have you stopped beating you wife?

Apart from not having any tortured and killed, just because I like how they taste you mean?

If 50% of the population did it today, that would be 50% less pain and suffering down the line (and 50% less methane and waste pollution).

I'm 'doing my bit' by not consuming them, including chickens?

Every journey has to start somewhere ...

We will see, but you better get that freezer filled up with animal carcases while you can, just in case.

Cheers, T i m

Ooh. Sore point. Sorry to have upset you so.

Oh, I see how respectful and reasonable you are.

Not at all. I couldn't give a damn what people call me.

Well, she would say that, wouldn't she. After all, she wouldn't want to upset the person who mated with her.

See above.

<snip>

For you, now would be a good time.

A caveman would definitely out survive us if our technologies failed.

<snip>

What's this, some actual sense for a change?

You are absolutely right for the vast majority, not only because they wouldn't be able (physically or emotionally) able to do what they might *need* to do to survive, but how to do it.

And once again it would demonstrate how animals are superior to us and have evolved over millions of years to do so, knowing what they can eat and what will poison / bite / kill them and how to best do the things they need to survive (like getting sufficient minerals) using (in most cases), just with what they were born with.

We can't easily eat most meat without fire and cooking (or cutting it very thin or pulverising it), couldn't catch much without traps, weapons or tools, and couldn't break it down into the bits we can eat (typically just the flesh), without more tools.

Q. Are all mushrooms edible? A. Yes, but many will kill you if you eat them.

Cheers, T i m

Ooh, 'nother sore point. You and your mate still looking for dicky?

If that massages your ego Dicky ...

Sure, when you coming round (maybe mommy could drop you off and wait, I'm sure you wouldn't be long ...)?

Cheers, T i m

<snip>

<snip pathetic trolling >

Well done, so you agree.

<snip>

And you agree again.

<snip>

Yes, to survive or out of necessity, except there is no such necessity

*today* for a vast proportion of the worlds population.

It has been known for plane crash victims to become cannibals. What we do when he *have to* isn't the same thing as doing those same things when we don't.

We our massive intellect and contrived might over all the other animals, we should also use that power to defend and protect.

With great power comes great responsibility. Only a coward or nutjob would use that to his advantage.

And if we took all the live stock out of the equation, there would be more useable land to grow useable food for humans to eat.

<snip>

You really are paranoid aren't you?

You know it's 'only me' talking here (well, and all the other people round the world who don't kill animals for pleasure or exploit them wherever possible), no one is stopping you doing whatever your morals see fit, and if that means slaughtering innocent animals to satisfy your taste buds then I'll let your own conscience determine if that makes you 'good' or not.

If you like the taste of 'meat' and agree, it would be better all round not to be raping, torturing and killing animals, then if you stop supporting that, they (the companies looking to make money) will put more resources into 'lab meat' or plant based alternatives.

It's funny. There is a Youtube vid that shows Earthling Ed having quite a long discussion with a nutter like you (over in the States) and he was doing exactly what you, Spike / Burk and Fredxx do and that's go round and round with same old chestnuts in an attempt to protect your own selfish desires and your 'face' (Fredxx is particularly fanatical about anyone telling him what to do, even though he has to live by thousands of other rules, legal, moral, ethical or societal every day). In the end they offer to buy said nutter a plant based cheese burger from a local Fast Food place and he can't eat it fast enough, agreeing it was 'very good'.

It wasn't a 'vegan burger', it was 'a burger' that happened to be made of plants not animal flesh and that he admitted himself was perfectly fine. Would he consider only buying them in the future ... who knows but he did say he was going to give veganism a go for a month. He didn't give a s*it about the animals though.

Cheers, T i m

Even more surprising you haven't grown up yet then.

Cheers, T i m

Bollocks.

Of the many, many types of mushrooms a relatively small number are poisonous and even fewer will kill you. Not a huge number are that good to eat but they won?t harm you. A few are harmless to some people but not others.

You would think a vegan would know that.

Haven?t you been on a course?

No, you just pontificate. You probably buy a tin of mushroom soup in Tesco and think you are saving the planet.

<snip for the lazy troll>

Nurse read it to you more like ...

When did that happen then, or are you still all screwed up in the head?

Brain Ray!

Cheers, T i m

Says the little mommy's boy who is always asking how to sort out mommy's scooter.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required