OT - for any email gurus

Oct 15, 2016 8 Replies
Saved reading
Jump to replies (8)

Just received some SPAM (gasp!) to a Hotmail account.



I looked at the message headers and stuff, and saw (small part):



" Subjectively-Blows: 2767



Thimbles-Cumulative: fcef678f31cb3



Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Message-ID:



Destined-Conceding-Motherly: 7C5EE9ED3C9C8



From: Google Support



Terrified-Smokestack: sarasota



Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" "



I am hoping that someone has been smoking stuff and encoding joke header and trace information.



Whatever, it passed all the way through the Outlook service without being flagged as SPAM.



Cheers



Dave R



I suppose it's just to "dilute" the information a Bayesian filter will be working from ...

I personally think that a lot of isps have had to reduce their filtering as there have been so many folse positives resulting in lost email in the last year or so If you look at some genuine headers you find some pretty weird stuff and so its probably no different filter wise to what has to be allowed these days. Time was when email headers were less than ten lines, now goodness knows what a lot of them do the main routing ones are still there though. Brian

Given that the headers aren't RFC compliant, I feel it should have been binned.

Mmm.

X-My-Snot-Tastes-S*it: Yes

is compliant but not

Destined-Conceding-Motherly: 7C5EE9ED3C9C8

En el artículo , Bob Eager escribió:

"be liberal in what ye accept and conservative in what ye send"

Postel's law.

formatting link

In general, I agree. However, with email thes edays one has to err more on the side of conservatism, I feel.

Yes. I Just ignore unknown headers (well and prolly a number of known ones I can't be arsed to worry about).

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required