new…

AKA doodle bug, V1 etc.

tracking the sound?

Funnily enough today's top end quadcopters can just about match a pulse jet for speed - for a short time.

There is also a new 'sentry gun' - auto cannon firing proximity or timed flak shells that comes bristling with all the sensors and can react in milliseconds.

Plus the Royal Navy's new laser gun..

War of the Drones indeed.

A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.

>…under the sun:
>
>

formatting link

So this is stolen tech... from WW" germany. A yukky is incapable to do anything positive.

No.

"There isn't one single inventor of the pulsejet; it evolved with several key figures like Russian engineer V.V. Karavodin (patented the first working design in 1906), French inventor Georges Marconnet (patented a valveless version in 1908), and American Robert Goddard (developed one in 1931). However, German inventor Paul Schmidt significantly developed the efficient, valved pulsejet used in the V-1 flying bomb during the 1930s, building on earlier work" [wiki]

They are not especially hard to make. The only issue is why anyone would want to.

They are staggeringly loud. I mean 130dB+, and not especially fuel efficient.

I suppose they are simple and cheap.

>> On 5 Dec 2025 20:15:53 GMT, Spike snipped-for-privacy@mail.com wrote: >>

>>>
>>> …under the sun:
>>>
>>>

formatting link

>>
>>
>> So this is stolen tech... from WW" germany.
>> A yukky is incapable to do anything positive.
>>
>No.
>
>"There isn't one single inventor of the pulsejet; it evolved with
>several key figures like Russian engineer V.V. Karavodin (patented the
>first working design in 1906), French inventor Georges Marconnet
>(patented a valveless version in 1908), and American Robert Goddard
>(developed one in 1931). However, German inventor Paul Schmidt
>significantly developed the efficient, valved pulsejet used in the V-1
>flying bomb during the 1930s, building on earlier work" [wiki]
>
>They are not especially hard to make. The only issue is why anyone would >want to.
>
>They are staggeringly loud. I mean 130dB+, and not especially fuel >efficient.
>
>I suppose they are simple and cheap.

Ignoring facts again.. as per normal your genetic scum genepool did not invent anything worthy. So not from yukraine. 4000+ pregnant eeus are arriving at Heathrow every month. These are the numbers from one airport alone. The ethnic cleansing that begain a few centuries ago in the UK is getting worse. But "Britsh values" yukky jenrick is ignoring the facts.

When I was a kid, a chap at school was playing with a pulse jet for powdering a model plane. He used old fashioned double-edged safety razor blades for the flap-valves, but they didn't last long, and bits of red-hot blade soon came flying out of the back in the exhaust! Fun though.

Model pulse jet engines have been available for decades. See for example