I don't work for Makita and have no connection with them other than owning a couple of pieces of kit from them with which I'm very satisfied.
Comparable manufacturers, Bosch and Dewalt also have product recalls - on at least as serious safety-related defects:
Your issue with Makita seems to be both the quality of the tools and that they didn't pay adequate compensation in respect to an incident in NZ.
Quality is on a par with other pro tool manufacturers - I would think (from seeing what people around me use) Makita have about 50% of the pro cordless drill market. They wouldn't have that unless those tools had proved themselves safe, reliable, durable and effective in the long term with large numbers of professional users.
As far as the compensation issue goes, there seems to be some aspect of NZ law that is distinctly different "ACC", that many of the posters on the original thread referred to - can you explain what this means?