That's a little bit of an exaggeration, although this has been around for many years.
Another blunder. You seem not to know the difference between the OSI
*model* and the ISO *stack*.
The ISO protocol stack never really stood a realistic chance of broad adoption. That became apparent as early as the early to mid 80s.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
D
Doctor Drivel
Keep your comments to yourself.
I have connected the local police, and had a chat with a very nice man who deals with Internet abuse, harassment, stalking, etc. I told him about you and that this crap has been going on your years and that whole threads on Google confirm the fact. He said they could act if the ISP does not. They usually contact the ISP if they don't do anything, if it continues they can invoke the law.
So lets' get down to basics. DO NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF MY POSTS. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS? I do not respond to yours and never have done unless provocation is there, so DO NOT respond to any of mine. Otherwise you may in problems not with your ISP but the LAW. You have now been openly informed and if you continue to act as you do, action will be taken against you. If you do continue after being publicly made aware of your actions you will not be helping yourself at all.
The above is very clear with no ambiguity. THINK HARD.
D
Doctor Drivel
Matt, you haven't a clue. I have had this with you a long time ago and it was clear you didn't have a clue about OSI. You don't know the difference between OSI and ISO. That is clear.
Balls Matt. It was in vogue and was heavily funded until the w.w.w. came in. Then an inferior TCP/IP was adopted which didn't have enough scope for all the addresses, as it was a cobbled together improvise in the first place.
T
The Natural Philosopher
I wouldn't care to admit publicly that I was someone who knew *less* than Drivel on any subject whatsoever. To do so is a plonkable offence...
D
Dave Plowman (News)
Since you seem hell bent to tell lies about me as above I'll comment as I see fit. Your lies must be corrected in print. As must your frequent misinformation. You might also take a look at my sig as further proof of your lies.
I'd say once they knew you'd told the lies as above they'd laugh as they threw you out - if not 'doing' you for wasting police time. But this is probably another of your lies.
No need to shout. It's bad manners. But shout as much as you want - it makes no difference. Get this you little twerp. I'll post what and when I like - within the law. And I don't tell lies unlike you.
bwahahahahahahah
More lies...
I mean this most sincerely. I'm *so* glad you are riled. At long last you might think on about your stupid posts of the 'snip rubbish' variety replying to many on here and stop them forthwith. Every single one in future you post with 'snip rubbish' etc and no content will be numbered for all to see. Oh - and please take it further. Sue me if you wish. I'll take great delight in exposing you to the world for the fool you are, and leave you penniless.
As they say in Glasgow "awa 'n' bile yer heed" you pathetic little man.
D
Doctor Drivel
Mr Plowman I am not joking. You are not doing yourself any favours, as the police agree that your actions are unlawful, that span many, many years. It is all there on Google, which I have taken dumps. What you have done is not harmless banter at all. You have taken no heed to decist by a number of group members and one of your posts openly said you would not and continue in the same manner.
Harassment, stalking, provocation, etc, on the "Internet", which covers Usenet, is treated with equal seriousness as telephone, letter or personal face-to-face. It is against the crimianl law which the police enfirce. I have sent you a personal email.
D
Doctor Drivel
Mr Plowman. Suing is civil law. You are breaking the criminal law. This was confirmed to me by the police. There are countless threads where you have no contribution and your only posts are to respond to me in a provocative manner. This clearly points to harassment, provocation, etc. A criminal act. What makes it worse, and reinforces the harassment, is that you have ignored requests to stop your actions.
You are now aware that your actions are against the criminal law, not civil.
D
Doctor Drivel
I sent an email to: snipped-for-privacy@davenoise.co.uk
Which you have now taken off your footer in the past day. The email was rejected. Mr email address is: doctor_drivelNO_SPAN@easy dot com
Email me before you dig yourself deeper. Remove NO_SPAM and dot.
M
Mike Tomlinson
In article , Dave Plowman (News) writes
My newsreader shows 490 posts in this thread, with 282 being visible. The rest have been auto-killfiled; they're all posted by Drivel and his sockpuppets. The man's a colossal waste of oxygen and disk space.
M
Mike Tomlinson
In article , Steve Firth writes
Yes, he is. This thread is a real laugh; it shows his total lack of clue with regard to IP addresses and much else besides.
C
Clive George
This thread has suddenly changed into one of the most amusing ones I've read for ages. You're displaying an astounding level of stupidity, far beyond your previous tedious efforts.
I've never met Dave. I've never had any dealings with him. I've got just as much information as you have about him. Yet I'm willing to bet a reasonable sum that I can email him - something that you've miserably failed to do.
But why bother? Email is so boring - it means nobody else can laugh at what you're writing. What was in that personal email?
Please, please call the police. Keep us up to date on the progress of your case.
clive
S
Stuart Noble
I'd love to be a fly on the wall when you make your complaint. What will you say when asked for your name? You are right round the twist of course, but it does raise interesting issues about whether you can harass someone who doesn't exist in any real sense of the word. If I lure Dr.Drivel to a secluded spot and beat his brains in, then I guess any previous online exchanges might have legal significance but, without his personal details, there is no one to harass.
D
Doctor Drivel
..and this man walks around with aname like Clive? Wow!
D
Doctor Drivel
..and this one lives in the middle of nowhere by himself. This si what solitude does.
D
Doctor Drivel
You are clearly odd. I hope the job at JM uni is going well. Let's keep it that way. They may like to know what you have been doing on their time and equipment.
D
Doctor Drivel
A systems admin man . The know-it-alls who know nothing. No one likes them.
D
Doctor Drivel
Sound was used.
Find out about the law Clivie. Is that what they call you?
J
John Rumm
Dribble, you are loosing the plot rapidly. You have single handedly (in your various alternate personalities) posted more crap to this group than any other single poster by a clear and large margin.
D
Doctor Drivel
Chav or John White or whatever you are today, you wouldn't know crap from wisdom if it slapped you in the face. An Essex trait I suppose.
D
Dave Plowman (News)
No - you're a joke.
Have you taken 'dumps' of your own replies to my carefully considered and worded posts to you designed to draw out any knowledge you may have rather than just internet downloads? The ones which say 'snip drivel' etc?
Aw, diddums. Get your nurse to kiss you better. If she has a mask handy.
I am my own man and do what *I* like - not what I'm 'told' to do by you or your sockpuppets.
Let's hope they 'enfirce' it well. The illiterate deserve help as much as any.
I have one from you asking if I've received 'a few' from you, which I've not. And I treat all mails from those too afraid to give their name as spam and bin them.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.