formatting link
didn't know this
Aug 06, 2020
20 Replies
Jim GM4DHJ ... formulated on Thursday :
The first I have heard of that too, thanks..
1) I think you meant to post that here:
formatting link
2) As you like brevity, I think it will be better if you posted the list of things you *do* know.
tee hee
Cheers, T i m
plenty...just haven't got a big gob like you timmy ....
Ok, of us, which is happy / respectful enough to conform to the Netiquette here and which of us can be seen 'gobbing off' on Youtube?
And constantly Tweeting stuff here about all sort of nonsense?
Who is happy to accept that the current way of measuring frequency is in Hertz and not insisting using cycles per second.
You are the classic example of someone with a big gob Crazy Jim.
Cheers, T i m
same thing
Except one is an SI unit and the other isn't.
One is an international quantity and the other isn't.
If we stayed in, Miles-per-hour would presumably be replaced by something else ?.
are people still stressing about that? I have a vague recollection it happened when I was doing block release as an apprentice around 1961!
There are always people concerned over nothing
NT
Yes, but Jim is one of those sad old radio amateurs who lives in the past.
And there is no logic to his statement.
If he's happy with 'cycles per second' because it means what it says, how uncomfortable must he be with pretty well ever other unit that doesn't (or not with any level of accuracy)?
No wonder it's driven him crazy! ;-)
Cheers, T i m
Interesting
Bill
+1
OOI, did you follow the youtube link?
only timmy is stressing about it...I just don't use it......I use the more descriptive cycles per second.....
like timmy
nothing sad about it...it is the place to be.....the hobby has been trashed.....
as you say timmy
why would he
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required