formatting link
- posted
3 years ago
didn't know this
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
Jim GM4DHJ ... formulated on Thursday :
The first I have heard of that too, thanks..
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
1) I think you meant to post that here:
formatting link
2) As you like brevity, I think it will be better if you posted the list of things you *do* know.
tee hee
Cheers, T i m
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
plenty...just haven't got a big gob like you timmy ....
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
Ok, of us, which is happy / respectful enough to conform to the Netiquette here and which of us can be seen 'gobbing off' on Youtube?
And constantly Tweeting stuff here about all sort of nonsense?
Who is happy to accept that the current way of measuring frequency is in Hertz and not insisting using cycles per second.
You are the classic example of someone with a big gob Crazy Jim.
Cheers, T i m
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
same thing
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
Except one is an SI unit and the other isn't.
One is an international quantity and the other isn't.
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
If we stayed in, Miles-per-hour would presumably be replaced by something else ?.
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
are people still stressing about that? I have a vague recollection it happened when I was doing block release as an apprentice around 1961!
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
There are always people concerned over nothing
NT
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
Yes, but Jim is one of those sad old radio amateurs who lives in the past.
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
And there is no logic to his statement.
If he's happy with 'cycles per second' because it means what it says, how uncomfortable must he be with pretty well ever other unit that doesn't (or not with any level of accuracy)?
No wonder it's driven him crazy! ;-)
Cheers, T i m
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
Interesting
Bill
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
+1
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
OOI, did you follow the youtube link?
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
only timmy is stressing about it...I just don't use it......I use the more descriptive cycles per second.....
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
like timmy
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
nothing sad about it...it is the place to be.....the hobby has been trashed.....
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
as you say timmy
- Vote on answer
- posted
3 years ago
why would he