Climate change: Jet fuel from waste 'dramatically lowers' emissions

formatting link
formatting link
Climate change: Jet fuel from waste 'dramatically lowers' emissions By Matt McGrath Environment correspondent

Published

1 hour ago contrail IMAGE COPYRIGHT GETTY IMAGES A new approach to making jet fuel from food waste has the potential to massively reduce carbon emissions from flying, scientists say.

Currently, most of the food scraps that are used for energy around the world are converted into methane gas.

But researchers in the US have found a way of turning this waste into a type of paraffin that works in jet engines.

The authors of the new study say the fuel cuts emissions by 165% compared to fossil energy.

The aviation industry worldwide is facing some difficult decisions about how to combine increased demand for flying with the need to rapidly cut emissions from the sector.

fuel image caption Researchers at the NREL lab in the US distilling the new fuel In the US, airlines currently use around 21 billion gallons of jet fuel every year, with demand expected to double by the middle of the century. At the same time, they have committed to cutting CO2 by 50%.

With the development of battery-powered airplanes for long haul flights a distant prospect at this point, much attention has focussed on replacing existing jet fuel with a sustainable alternative.

Current methods of making green jet fuel are based on a similar approach to making biodiesel for cars and heavy goods vehicles.

It normally requires the use of virgin vegetable oils as well as waste fats, oil and grease to make the synthetic fuel.

At present, it is more economical to convert these oils and wastes into diesel as opposed to jet fuel - which requires an extra step in the process, driving up costs.

Now, researchers say that they have developed an alternative method able to turn food waste, animal manure and waste water into a competitive jet hydrocarbon.

Much of this material, termed wet-waste, is at present is turned into methane gas. However, the authors found a way of interrupting this process so it produced volatile fatty acids (VFA) instead of CH4.

The researchers were then able to use a form of catalytic conversion to upgrade the VFA to two different forms of sustainable paraffin.

food waste image caption Food waste is a global problem and a major cause of global warming emissions When the two forms were combined they were able to blend 70% of the mixture with regular jet fuel, while still meeting the extremely strict quality criteria that Federal authorities impose on aircraft fuels.

"There's exciting jet fuels that rely on burning trash and dry waste but this actually works for those wastes that have high water content, which we normally dispose of in landfill," said Derek Vardon, a senior research engineer at the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the lead author on the study.

"Being able to show that you can take these volatile fatty acids, and that there's a really elegant, simple way to turn it into jet fuel - that's where I see the broader applicability of this one, and folks can continue to develop and refine it."

The new fuel has a potentially significant impact on emissions as it not only limits the CO2 that comes from fossil sources used by the airlines, but it also gets rid of the methane that would bubble up from landfill if the waste food was just dumped.

Another major advantage is that this new fuel produces around 34% less soot than current standards. This is important because soot plays a key role in the formation of contrails from airplanes which adds a powerful warming effect to CO2 coming from the engines.

engine image caption Emissions from flying are set to rise rapidly over the next two decades "That's where we see the most potential for this technology is that you're preventing methane emissions, and dramatically lowering the carbon footprint of jet fuel. And you just can't do that with fossil fuels without getting into things like offsets," said Derek Vardon.

The research team say they are planning to scale up the production of the new fuel and aim to have test flights with Southwest Airlines in 2023.

Many environmental groups are sceptical about attempts to develop sustainable aviation fuels, believing that it amounts to green-washing. They argue that people should just fly less.

"Sustainable aviation fuel is not a silver bullet," Derek Vardon says.

"So we do want to definitely emphasise that reduction is the most important and most significant change you can make. But there's also pragmatism and need for aviation solutions now, so that's where we want to strike a balance as we need a basket of measures, to really start getting our carbon footprint down in a variety of sectors, including aviation."

The study has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

Follow Matt on Twitter.

Reply to
Jethro_uk
Loading thread data ...

Now that's rather clever! :-)

Reply to
Chris Green

Maybe they could also make some Kerosene for my central heating boiler. I wonder what the price would be.

Reply to
Michael Chare

Yes, I thought the same. How are they calculating it, I wonder. And how much energy is needed to convert the waste into this miracle fuel that actually absorbs CO2 ?

Reply to
Chris Hogg

Increased demand for flying,really? Not at the moment, quite the reverse in fact. So what is the magic ingredient and is it energy efficient to put food waste through this process. Its no good if it uses more energy to do it than you save by doing it, unless you use renewables of course. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff (Sofa

That was my first reaction but it seems to be explained by this paragraph.

============== "The new fuel has a potentially significant impact on emissions as it not only limits the CO2 that comes from fossil sources used by the airlines, but it also gets rid of the methane that would bubble up from landfill if the waste food was just dumped. ============

(they also seem to imply elsewhere that it is not currently dumped but it turned into methane which is presumably used as a fuel, which rather demolishes the 165% argument.

============ Much of this material, termed wet-waste, is at present is turned into methane gas. ==============

Reply to
Chris B

On Anglesey and no doubt elsewhere food waste has to be put in special bags which are then put in brown bins for collection each week. The council supplies the bags which I think are biodegradeable. I wonder if these bags would also be convertd to jet fuel.

Reply to
Michael Chare

What about the amount of energy used to transport millions of tons of waste food to the processing plants?

Reply to
alan_m

[snip report]

One or two publications we subscribe to also send the comic out in bio-degradable bags. Round here, at least, you can either use such bags or wrap the grub in newspaper.

Reply to
Tim Streater

And it will probably take the total number of bags put out for collection on Anglesey to make enough fuel to allow a single aircraft to taxi to a runway :)

Reply to
alan_m

I wish they would collect dog poo bags from all the hedgerows and use them for something useful.

Reply to
Andrew

You'd need to sort this waste food from other waste and then collect. Transfer it to wherever it's processed. All of which takes energy.

Feeding waste food to farm animals proved uneconomic years ago. Wonder why?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News

It's not as though fossil fuels magically transport themselves to a refinery, etc. There's a lot of CO2 expended in the extraction process.

Reply to
GB

Our council already collect our green bin each week - food and garden waste. Already separate from other waste.

You may be right, but I thought that it was concerns about passing diseases to livestock that effectively brought a stop to it.

Reply to
Steve Walker

The first converted waste, was deep fat fryer oil from restaurants. At one time, the restaurants paid to have the oil taken away as a waste product. Then one day, entrepreneurs were hauling it away for free.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

We have food waste entirely separate from all other waste. In its own little bin. Collected weekly. Other, larger bins (garden and recycling, and general) are collected on alternate weeks. So no separation needed.

Perhaps because those nasty proteins needed a higher temperature (than boiling, I mean) to degarde. Perhaps they were also afraid of some witty people adding broken glass or razor blades to the scoff.

Reply to
Tim Streater

Or just running their cars on it, to a smell of chips :)

Reply to
Jethro_uk

Better still, collect the people who dump the dog poo bags and use them for something useful.

Reply to
Richard

I make the US jet fuel consumption from that article about 80 million tons per year. Our food waste is of the order of 5 kg per week for two people. So 350 million Americans would produce about 40 million tons a week at the same rate as us. There is, presumably, a comparable amount of "food waste" in the food production industry. So the numbers sort of tie up, with 100% mass for mass efficiency. But I'd have thought that stopping at the methane stage would make more sense, I suspect that steel and cement production and general industial process heating could absorb all that methane. Or it could go straight into CCGTs. Also of course kerosine-like paraffins can be used for shipping and for trucks which have the same sort of range issues as planes.

Reply to
newshound

It is a simple matter to filter that and use it in an older diesel engine. Converting food waste to aircraft fuel is going to be a lot more complex.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.