- posted
1 year ago
OT - don't drive an electric car, take the bus instead
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
S-P-E-C-T-A-C-U-L-A-R !!!
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Just out of curiosity, how toxic are the gasses coming off that fire?
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Yikes!
Back in the 1960s the future of urban buses was going to be "super flywheels", where a large flywheel in a vacuum enclosure would be spun up to provide motive power. I guess that didn't work out either.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
I saw a documentary on that. Its sorta of, almost, kinda worked. Very fascinating though.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
It was also tried out in the NYC subway system way back in the 1970's.
ah....
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
The city is very proud of their new Gillig electric buses. So far that brand isn't given to spontaneous combustion like the Bollores.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
May be better to take your yacht:
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
My yacht:
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
I'll compromise. I won't take that bus.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Much better choice assuming it doe not have a lithium battery or use gas.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
The phone has a Li-polymer battery but I can toss it overboard if it acts up, even assuming I brought it with me. I've got a step counter app I like but I don't think it does paddle strokes.
Not yachts but I'm guessing $5 gas will put a crimp into the cabin cruiser market although a lot of them never leave the dock anyway.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
We rented space to another business where I worked and he had a cigarette boat in the warehouse. Sold it when fuel was cheap but it could easily burn 20+ gallons an hour.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Do you fish from it?
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Those bus fires were something to behold!
I do not think the extra dust from the extra weight from the batteries on BPEV's is that much of an issue. We have semi's with tons of extra weight running all around and the extra tire dust does not seem to be an issue.
The flying retreads all over the place is somewhat of an physical hazard to other vehicles, but a small one.
Things against BPEV's:
1) buy your own damned car.2) the spectacular fires from the batteries.
3) they are hard to start in cold weather.I personally would not own a BPEV, but to each his own, as long as you do not threaten me with imprisonment and loss of property to subsidize your taste in cars.
If FCEV's (Fuel Cell EV's) come down in price and the fuel becomes readily available, I'd certainly be interested.
Gasoline vehicles are getting cleaner and more efficient all the time too.
Let the market determiner things and the government and elites butt out.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
If we took that approach to seat belts, air bags, 10 mph bumpers, improved fuel economy, how much longer do you think it would have been until we got those? We tried that approach with food safety until around the turn of the 20th century. How was that working out?
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Nope. When I lived in NH I built one of these:
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
I don't see dust as a problem but I would expect increased tire wear with heavier vehicles and recycling tires isn't very efficient,
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Sweet!
I wrote my own fishing rules:
Rule #16: Fancy Equipment: with the exception of a good rod, nice reel, and good quality line and leader, eschew fancy equipment. You can catch fish with a fly on bare line with your hands. It is far more important to be out ?on the water?.
I am up to 29 rules now.
- Vote on answer
- posted
1 year ago
Pissed off turtle soup?