Re: The value of shopping local

Nov 11, 2007 227 Replies
3D Peruna wrote in news:6b_Zi.28$ snipped-for-privacy@newsfe06.lga:

The key, then, is to somehow get the kids to care. One caring teacher really can make a big difference...what a child needs is at least one caring adult, even if it isn't a "parent" (I put that in quotes, because IMO, just contributing to the dropping a wriggler into a doctor's hands is in no way equivalent to actually being a Parent...). I sure as heck didn't learn about what motehrs are from my female chromosome donor; my frined's parents were more involved with my activities than my own (and they bever had to beat me black and blue to get me to follow their suggestions).

Parents are important, but it is erroneous to think that bad parents are the end all and be all, and that nobody else can step in and be a great influence in a child's life - and education.

More to the point, they don't care - their protstations of "caring" are self-delusion, and illusion, created so that they "look good" and "keep face". Actions speak ouder, however, than words - if you care about a child, you learn what to do to try to keep teh child healthy, which includes nutrition. If one does not, it's nothing more than self- centeredness and laziness. Well, sometimes sheer stupidity...

Part of the problem is precisely the ntion that kids are basically [porpoerty, and what "parents" do to them is "nobody else's business". If people treated a dog or cat teh way many people treat their kids, there would be hell to pay.

Yes, people are nosey - but that is far different from being *concerned*. Merely gossiping about someone's neglect or abuse is low and stupid and destructive.

OK, so really, we know all of that. Most people suck. But does that make it ethical to merely ignore what happens to children? In a way, part of the problem is that people are so obsessed over what they think tobe their own individual rights, that they refuse to learn from, or take advice from, ANYONE. ANd they also refuse to answer to anyone. They have, they beleive, the "right" to "raise" their kids however they damn well please, regardless of whetehr it is harmful to the child.

No. Poeple have the right tio harm themselves if they wish, but a child is a human being, and taking into account different styles of child rearing, there are things which harm children, period. Malnutrition is one such thing, and ther eis no excuse for it to exist in a houshold that is materially decently well-off - it's nothing more than parental laziness (and yes, many kids *are* malnourished, precisely because of not being provided adequate nutrition because it's "too hard" or "takes too much time" to provide erasonably-helathy food). WHy is this permitted? Why is it OK to allow poeple to harm other poeple, just becaus ethose other people are not adults? What kind of mindset is it to accept that someone has a *right* do harm their child, simplybecause the figure that the child is their "property"?

SO what is the solution? Or not even "the" solution, but at least some possible solution?

"Amy Blankenship" wrote in news:h2Z_i.4009$ snipped-for-privacy@bignews6.bellsouth.net:

More to the point, further back, there *was* public education - teh proverbial Schoolhouse. Many people didn't get past early grades, because they had to start working -0 that it true. But a fifth-grade education form the old schoolhouse was better than the current bhigh- school diploma.

THe difference was that education was more local, and I think that people therefore were more invested in it.

Also, a huge problem is that the people born in the 60's and 70's

*generally* (not of course universal) knew less hardship than did us "old geezers", and when they had kids, those kids (again, very general) knew even less hardship. It's not uncommon for kids to have weekly allowances exceeding $100-$300, even when the parents are working extra jobs to provide that allowance, and many kids don't even have trhe responsibility of taking out the garbage once a week, or mowing the law - they have no real *role* in their households, other than to exist. And I think that's a big problem. part of being a family is sharing not only fun, but also, responsibilities, because the latter actually forge tighter bonds between people - ther eis just something special about overcoming a problem together.

But when that doesn't exist, and people don't even sit down to dinner together, what sort of bonds *can* exist? Many kids grow up being just plain unconnected to much of anything, with the result that many don't care about much of anything.

I don't knwo what role schools can play in all of this, but I do have the idea that the increased bureaucratization of school systems jsut adds to that detatchment, because the school, at least in more urban areas, is not really rooted in any community - administrators come froma ll over, and it's just this massive conglomeration that the kids move through.

In a way, it's soprt of like "globalization" - massive faceless organizations in which the poeple who should be, and used to be, most important (the "consumer", or, in the case of schools, the kids, and specifically, their education) is now the least important.

As with a globalized corporation, the people making up the base of the theoretical pyramid (as in, We The People), become powerless, lacking control, emotionally detatched, becasue they are no longer dealing with something that' spart of their community, but rather, some huge faceless monster hat sits on them, is imposed by some distant force.

I think that is the underlying foundation-stone of a great many problems.

But the sulution is...?

"Don" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news3.newsguy.com:

THey had public education is at least some communities - but it was community/public, not state/public or federal/public. Even when states had standards, schools were still part and parcel of, "owned", if you will, by, the local community.

But it did exist.

"Don" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news3.newsguy.com:

So what we need is to get 6-yr-olds back into the factories, do away completely with anything even remotely resembling worker safety, return to the Company Town and Company Store system, return to Boss Tweed politics, and go back to not giving a damn is there is a dead worker for every yard of railroad or pavement...?? Oh, and let's not forget the good old days of cholera, and rampant TB, and polio...

The past was not perfect. They had their problems then, we have our problems now, and we solve nothing by simply citing some need to return to a suppsoedly idyllic past. The past was never idyllic, unless perhaps one was wealthy - and even the wealthy got polio.

THere are huge problems today, but there are also things I personally would not trade to return top the past. heck, a simple-enough example - Dr. S. Waxman, working at Rutgers University - yes, one of those horrible, evil public institutions - discovered tetracycline. I was one of the first guinea pigs to get it - I was not even two, and dying from a URI, so the doctors had nothing to lose by giving it to me. And, for better or worse, here I am...

THe past is a fabric, a tapestry, and present-day solutions can't be achieved by merely cutting cutting patches from the past and sewing them on. Society *as a whole* needs to reassess itself.

3D Peruna wrote in news:qj_Zi.29$ snipped-for-privacy@newsfe06.lga:

"More Money" is unfortunatley very American - it's a lot like "bigger vehicles" and "giant teevee screens". IOW, the entire "bigger is better" mentality. What matters more is quantity rather than quality, appearance rather than substance.

The most important aspect of education, however, is *not* ever-more- expensive gee-gaws, but rather, learning how to think - how to gather facts, assimilate them, derive principles, and then apply thiose principles to other areas. I learned that on my own, but it'd be interesting to see it being taught, because it's so useful.

"Michael Bulatovich" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@news4.newsguy.com:

Voting with one's feet... My sister moved to England, and then to Australia (having married an Aussie), and has never looked back - she loves it there.

Or even not necessarily political. I think that any positive action has a ripple effect. As does any negative action. And whatever sort fo ripples onemakes do tend to come back to one... SO as I see it, beingt at least occasionally interested in others benefits my own self-interest ;)

++ wrote in news:c9mdnZNj-ogJ89nanZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@rcn.net:

THe other thing is, WHy bother kids if you aren't going to enjoy them? I couldn't have any, but if I did, esp. when older, the greatest thing would be going out and watching them explore teh world. One of the best things about raising birds was seing them do that, explore their world (huge cage but often, the whole apartment ) and grow and develop. I just don't see why a lot of people have kids at all, given that many just ignore tham and bitch about them.

My Dad taught me fractions like that. Fodd is always a good stimulant for learnign

Or even things like Origami, or making models (plastic, paper, wood, clay, whatever).

The worst way, IMO, is to take active, squirmy kids, slam their butts down into a chair, and expect them to learn a bunch of rote stuff that isn't related (byt the instructor) to anything useful or practical or real.

Sorta like the thought of everyone walking around with their own nukes being far worse (but more fleeting) than the worst government that the framers could have imagined when they declared the right to bear arms to address that problem?

At the head of every glittering line of kings, there's a bloody dagger.

What the uninsured are doing is letting the public pay for the risk. Your hospital bill is about 33% higher than it should be because you are paying for those like YOU who don't bother to pay. Some people die without needing any medical care, some need a little, and a few quite a bit. A national pool is the only way to average out costs. If you get sick with a private policy, they drop you.

Overall the costs of insurance in the medical business is less than you pay for your private life. It is not evenly distributed by area, however.

,

Uh, cumin is a *spice*, Don. ;)

Besides, I'm saving myself for threeways with Ken Tucky. ;D

Ah, ok, I've seen the film. Wholesome family entertainment. 'Midnight Cowboy' with Voight, too, comes to mind.

The other day, I tried without success to find and download 'Ms. Robinson', with Dustin Hoffman.

Try looking for "The Graduate."

I think that's what I used, but I'll give it another try just in case, thanks.

BTW, as per your "suggestion", yesterday, I decided to have a can sardines for some vitamin D... I don't feel any different... When's it supposed to kick in?

According to the below, you'd have to eat at least two and a half cups of them to hit the now often recommended 1000 units.

formatting link
I'm taking 2000 units a day. With me the main (and first) effect is to regularize the circadian clock, and I feel the effects within a day or two. Do you sleep well in the winter?

Without it, I start to fall asleep earlier and earlier, and waking earlier and earlier, which means I eventually start living like a vampire. Very bad for the brain. Mood changes have followed the sleep cycle getting messed up in the past. Now that's all history.

Definitely good points to consider, and, yes, sometimes I do have trouble sleeping well in the winter. I am aware of that vitamin, its importance and how to get it (Shitake mushroom and salmon omelete, anyone?) but will admit that I generally rely on getting it with sun exposure or through natural sources, which of course can be very difficult during the winter... Ok, I'll look into vitamin supplements then.

hmm, I'm uppping my dose. Any side effects?

No, you just think you are not a biological person who can get sick. At some point you will, and then you will have to become a sponge and ask the rest of us to pay for you.

Not that I know of. You should be aware that I'm a pretty *big* specimen, and that factors into my self-treatment. The other half of my regimen is to walk the dog for half an hour or so in the morning to take in some of that high-intensity blue light. These two are my ailerons.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required