Tom, it's just in keeping with the stupidity of Keeter's
thread. You ain't seen nuttin' yet!
I almost wrote the "kill you" phrase on the previous post,
but knowing the morons that read the Wreck, I figured I
would once again be misunderstood! :)
For anyone reading this thread who thinks the above treatment 'harsh',
how difficult it can be to get consensus on Usenet, and how many regulars
approved this thread (normally, herding cats would
be simpler than polarising opinion in the wreck).
Then, please - at the least - do a little research and review
some of the threads and posts of the troll in question. Note that a number
of 'supporters' of the troll have suddenly appeared from nowhere (not *all*
them, a few are genuine).
A brief synopsis of the troll:
Began shortly after a major attack (Perry's dog dying thread)
More than 5700 posts between Dec 2002 and Jun 2004.
316 per month, most in diatribes against others.
Regular attacks on newbies
Regular attacks on regulars, in fact, these were actively targeted.
Denies the obvious when caught.
Refuses to answer when caught in lies.
Refuses to answer when caught slandering.
When the OP posted this, there was a sudden outburst of sockpuppets,
accompanied by an error in the trolls munged email address, indicating
These are not unsubstantiated claims, they are factual and easily confirmed
by Google. The troll will continue to claim "black as white", so please - do
a little research for yourself before bringing the troll back for the rest
of us. Make your own decision, by all means, but consider what has
occurred to get us, collectively, to this point.
We can now expect a host of posts from the troll under various guises and
pretending to be others so, before responding, please consider this
likelihood and refuse to be drawn into "baited" posts. These posts will not
necessarily appear to be from the troll himself, causing in-fighting and
dissention is the trolls
aim - who actually *does* the fighting is irrelevant.
It will take a while, but we'll win out eventually.
*MORE* evidence you mean? *MORE* evidence that you will ignore and refuse to
reply to? Ok, one final time.
First, now that you're predictably abusive response has arrived, I'll point
out that I have not yet signed up to ignore you in this thread - check my
Second, there's not enough pixels to list *all* of your lies, abuse and
slander, but here's a start:
Third, you recently claimed to have killfiled me
- it seems that is just another lie.
Whatever insults you care to hurl now, do as I (and others) have done, and
reference them to give them some credibility, then at least once in nearly
6000 posts we can say you supported your lies and slander with something
approximating a fact.
NOW I am happy to say I am done with you. You can change identities all you
want, but you've busted your identity RECON TROLL - your done here.
Well, I am no expert, but I have found the Freud WWII blade to work
wonderfully in my TS. Maybe your fence is not adjusted correctly? What
sort of fence is it? Typically the problem is that the back of the fence
is tilted in slightly.
Doh! Good catch. Well, at least someone read it. I guess it was a
freudian slip :)
I do have to say though, I thought its hype was mostly BS, but it really
does do a beautiful job and slices like crazy. I am not sure it is worth
the bucks, but it sure is nice.
why would you think I have to have WW talent, anyway? I can
be interested in WW without being GREAT at it, you twit! and
a condescending one, at that. screw you!
besides, moron, how do you know how well or poorly I can
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.