It was hot, sunny and the whites probably didn't survive that well there.
The genes for colouring your skin black are still there but not active.
It was hot, sunny and the whites probably didn't survive that well there.
The genes for colouring your skin black are still there but not active.
Typical socialist. Their form of belive has to be unquestioning. Don't deviate from the party line. The leader is always right. Even if he's a verified liar.
You have to be thick/live in Lala Land to be a socialist.
>
So you think women shouldn't vote or work, you shouldn't be able to join a union, you should be a serf then.
Just how far back do you want to take your values and traditions?
You have to ask yourself what happened to Australian Aboriginals. And red Indians
+1 >
+1 >
+1 >
You seem to have replied to me. Why?
>
There is nothing wrong here.
Tasmania? Don't make me laff. I know where it is because I used to live in the shithole of Australia. 9/10 people have never heard of the place. Australia matters not in this world.
So your attempt to vilify anyone is by calling them a socialist?
Tee hee. You must have very limited experience if you truly believe this is restricted to 'socialists'.
Everyone called Harry is thick too, then.
You really do like extrapolation, don't you?
Somebody who hangs around with other bigots assumes their own bigotry is normal.
But you would be ashamed if you weren't?
Plus a few supporters, although since they are the usual fuckwits, it's entirely probable that a sensible poster has them blocked.
*ding*
That "white men" are utterly superior to everybody else?
You REALLY need to ask what is wrong with stating that?
There you go again. Twisting what was said by omitting stuff so that context is skewed. Dave Plowman had asserted that racist bigots are obviously ashamed. My response was that I am not ashamed of being a white British straight male. Following the logic of your ilk, I therefore must be a racist bigot. BFD.
No more than you assuming that the majority support your views.
The bigots, as you label them, are generally work colleagues and other working people. It is merely the ignorant isolated buffoons who really believe that the majority of the population loves everybody else irrespective of race or sexual deviances.
You really need to learn to comprehend. Where, exactly, did I state That "white men" are utterly superior to everybody else?
I do however, completely agree with the statement: Where there were enough white men,the "colonies" prospered. Eg Australia, New Zealand, USA, Canada.
If they aren't, then that prosperity is utterly irrelevant to whether white men were there or not.
Now you put it like that, yes, white men do indeed seem to be utterly superior to everybody else. Thanks.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.