In article , Lurch of snipped-for-privacy@sjwelectrical.co.uk, felt we'd be interested in the following...
I, as a colleague, observe him carrying out the task and believe he is competent to do so. That is my opinion based on a variety of factors centering on common sense, and it very much counts "here" so far as this thread is concerned at least.
There is no probably about it AFAIC.
I never generalised. I've explained why our establishment carries out 'on site' testing and who does it. Your generalisations were incorrect in respect of our site.
You implied incompetence before you knew the facts and expressed uncertainty over the legality of the procedure.
We didn't just go out and buy a PAT tester and declare ourselves 'fit for purpose' - although I suspect that does occur - we had a financial, operational and legal reason to do so.
I suppose that's one way to admit you are wrong.
HAND.