Chav, it emits far less crap into the air.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
More on electric cars.
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
IT seems you are familiar with this mythical section.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Chav do you still have one?
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Well suggest some workable reliable ones then Harry, and don't bother with Solar I've been working outside all this week and the amount of sunshine.. Well wouldn't power a dolls house let alone the few delivery lorries we've had here...
And the wind .. lets ignore that so whats left?..
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Depends. Smaller trains with greater frequencies is generally better.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Rapid it is not.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Liverpool's boulevards were built to take trams in the centres. The city's tram network was the by far the biggest.
It is like talking to children. Trolleybuses are silly the regularly run off the wires. Wires are expensive and ugly. Supercap buses have eclipsed trams and trolleybuses.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
But a bad answer. The best answer is not have a diesel in the first place.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Like a bendy bus.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
It's actually a hypothesis, not a theory, but leaving that side, perhaps you'd like to tell us what this hypothesis is *based* on.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
How's your Trabant, k*****ad?
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Oh no, he can't reads either. Supercap buses have eliminated trolleybuses off the future transport map.
A tram is a train on a street - a daft idea. See my post on my they came about.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Electricity. In terms of per passenger it will be cheaper than personal transport. From a mix of tecnologies. And before you ask,
formatting link
is the way forward. Supercapicitor buses. Capabus:
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
No they don't.
It's a city and therefore ugly anyway. Who cares.
No they haven't.
You're really thick as shit, aren't you. How's your Trabby? Bust down yet?
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
so called 'levelised' costs which you obtain by taxing carbon and subsidising windmills.
A complete fraud, but it fools harry well enough
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
No, not in the slightest.
It's not toxic at all.
No they aren't.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
formatting link
"The Department for Transport will pay £173.5m towards the scheme, with the rest coming from local authorities"
"Work is expected to start in 2016, with the network operational by 2018."
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
So, based on nothing at all, then. As I thought. Just a random statement that "some cost will equal some other cost in 2020".
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Harry, was right. You are thick.