Wood magazine

I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a reasonable offer?

Reply to
AAvK
Loading thread data ...

I subscribe to Wood and think it is a good magazine.

The projects are not impossible for an amatuer like myself and the tool reviews seem to be legit.

Reply to
RayV

I used to get it. For close to a buck an issue, it's a decent value. It has about an equal mix of technique, projects and reviews. However, I terminated the subscription because I felt that I had outgrown it. The content is a bit slanted to the newbie.

That said, It's not a bad publication.

-Steve

Reply to
Stephen M

I think it's a good mag. I get it. After awhile it gets a little repetitive (as all hobby mags do), but I can usually find at least 1 interesting tip or project idea or enjoyable article per issue. I've built a couple things where their plans served as inspiration over the years. That's a great price, I think it's worthwhile to try it.

Reply to
bf

Got the same offer. Bought a copy to look at it and signed up. Sounded like a pretty cheap deal to me too.

Regards.

Tom

Reply to
Tom Banes

what's the book? on their website they have the same offer, except that the freebie is a downloadable set of plans.

Reply to
bridger

Me or Tom?

Reply to
AAvK

yearly special out in stores now titled "Best-Ever Workshops" that has a photo tour of nine shops along with articles on wiring, lighting, heating your shop and a lot of storage ideas. If only each issue was as good as this special one.

Big John

Reply to
Big John

Reply to
John DeBoo

Not a bad magazine, but they do things that seem strange to me. I find it amusing. Here's an example...not too long ago, they did an article on how well glues hold up underwater. Guess what was missing? Titebond III.

"That's weird" I says... "It's been out for some time now"

Even weirder, on the back cover there's a full-page glossy Titebond III advertisement IN THAT VERY ISSUE!

Now, there's two schools of thought here:

  1. They *knew* it didn't hold up underwater and intentionally omitted it and posted the "it exists, and had you tested it, it would have kicked ass" note in the "letters" section of the next issue so it never had to get on the graph.

  1. Perhaps the professional glue reviewer really didn't know about it (dispite having over-saturating everybody with 'III marketing materials) and are even more unbiased than Ralph Nader and Consumer Reports.

(and no, I've not tried it myself, so I have no first-hand knowledge of how it actually performs. I, like most canadian woodworkers, use duct tape)

AAvK wrote:

Reply to
root

Sounds interesting, they are bhg controlled, and most magazine publishing is add driven so maybe they didn't accept payment to place tb-III "on top" or at least near the top in their critique...? Who knows besides them. Or it could be that that is what they want, money for the review, and it didn't fall through. I can see it would be some info that anyone should want to know, and it wasn't there.

Reply to
AAvK

How about:

  1. The article was written months ago, before TB3 was introduced and the editor finally got around to using the article to fill space on that issue.
Reply to
Edwin Pawlowski

Where do you see 3 years for $28 on their website? Only thing I see is

1 year for $28 and a free plan for a heirloom chest. OP says he got 3 year sub offer + a book for $28.
Reply to
CyBrShRk

In the snail mail, USPS. Call them and ask for the same deal. I am sure they'll do it.

formatting link

Reply to
AAvK

Reply to
John DeBoo

Hey, thats what I said, no fair! 8*) John

Reply to
John DeBoo

Thanks John, it seems to be a viable enough mag for a newb such as myself, so, I bought.

Reply to
AAvK

I think you'll like it. I've made a couple of projects from their plans with good results. They were easy to follow straightforward, that my sill level can handle.

Reply to
Edwin Pawlowski

No no no!! There must be a conspiracy, dammit! This trend towards sensible explanations must stop.

Reply to
Paul Kierstead

Those theories were for the enjoyment of that guy that was being shut-out of quality stuff by not being a contractor... I think that might have been "bf" :-)

These new theories won't get high ratings :-)

Reply to
root

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.