Water Based Wipe On?

I've got one or two thousand square feet of hardwood walls. Not panel sheets, but T&G hardwood, mostly ash. It is ~50 years old & the original finish was slopped on with a mop. The finishers did the upper half of the walls, then came back & did the lower half --- with a nasty overlap, drips, etc. Wear & tear over the decades has left it worse for wear.

The old finish sands off easily, but since it is in an occupied house, the use of solvent based finishes for refinishing is out. Because it's all vertical work, I'd much prefer a wipe-on finish.

Any experiences, recommendations or pointers towards manufacturers of water based, wipe-on finishes, available by the gallon? Any thoughts on using water based, gallon packaged finishes meant for floors or for spraying, but wiping it on vertical surfaces?

Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Daniel

Reply to
DanielBK
Loading thread data ...

There is no reason that they couldn't be wiped on.

Reply to
dadiOH

There is with some products.

Lots of WB stuff doesn't flow out the same as oil based as it dries very quickly. Thinning can can be the kiss of death for some WB products. Without a specific product mentioned, general comments are tough.

I've had experience applying "spray only" WB finishes with foam brushes, and you have to work FAST, be very mindful of the wet edge, and not overwork the finish. Hand application is limited to small objects.

The OP should be aware that water based products can actually be as or more toxic than solvent based products, so good personal protective devices and forced ventilation are plenty important. Do not be fooled into thinking WB is safe to breathe. The real gain is the lack of an explosion hazard.

For one or two thousand sq/ft, I'd probably spend $100 for a cheaper HVLP unit and a window fan, and spray it with ML Campbell Ultrastar. Ultrastar holds vertical surfaces very nicely. I'd also seal it first with wiped-on Zinsser Seal Coat to prevent contaminants from messing with the WB product.

Reply to
B A R R Y

I recently finished several thousand feet of T & G pine with water base poly. I highly recommend that you first seal the wood with a shellac based sealer or some other low odor, fast drying, non-water based sealer. Otherwise you are going to end up with a raised grain and a rough finish. I did not wipe on the poly I used, I used a roller and sanded lightly between coats, and I used a poly sold for use on floors. Good results all around.

Reply to
SteveC

A-ha! I missed the floor product part.

That would be very bad if they dried quickly...

Reply to
B A R R Y

He asked about floor products. They are customarily wiped on with a mohair applicator. IME, they don't dry all that fast either.

Reply to
dadiOH

Excellent feedback from one and all. As with most such projects, the decision process involves compromises.

First, the safety caution about breathing WB vapors was unknown to me. While I'd likely have discovered by reading the label, it's nice to know in advance.

I hadn't thought of HVLP, and though I'm desirous of using a wipe on finish (rag as opposed to foam/brush/mohair), I'm glad for the caution about the fast drying factor if I go that route. My understanding from the discussion is that a floor product may buy me a little longer drying time - please correct me if I'm wrong.

Regarding sealer, I had it in my head that whatever sealer was originally used would still be down "in" the wood when I sanded off the finish that is "on" the wood. From the comments offered, it appears I'm incorrect to expect any benefit along those lines - especially with respect to contaminants. I had also been thinking that ash was not likely to give me much grief with raised grain or fuzz, but then the lighbulb went off - the operative term in water based finish is water! Darn right I'm going to need to seal it!

This is one of those occasions when I'm very pleased to discover my thinking was wrong and I was ignorant of several things that I need to consider. Thanks guys! Any other comments or suggestions are most welcome.

Daniel

Reply to
DanielBK

I think you're on solid ground so far.

The sealer will provide two benefits in this case.

#1 - Less water soaks in to raise the grain.

#2 - A "barrier coat", which will prevent any oils, or other artifacts of the unknown old finish, as well as waxes and components of years of cleaning agents, from interfering with the complex chemistry of your typical WB finish.

Reply to
B A R R Y

A sideline hint from Heloise regarding wax and other like contaminates... You can go to NAPA or any automotive paint supplier and purchase Grease and Wax remover. It's expensive stuff - in the neighborhood of $50 per gallon, but it works. It really works. It will do a superb job of removing wax from any surface without leaving contaminates behind or damaging the original surface. You don't need to purchase a gallon of it - a little bit goes a very long way. I wipe down an entire car with a shop rag dampened with it. It takes a couple of minutes to dry so it does not leave a residue behind like solvents do.

Reply to
Mike Marlow

Interesting... Sounds like great stuff.

Have you ever tried it under water base lacquer?

Does NAPA sell it in small quantities? I'd really like to test it.

Reply to
Bonehenge (B A R R Y)

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.