On Sep 11, 11:31 am, Luigi Zanasi snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: >
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 11, 11:29 am, Luigi Zanasi snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: >
> > > On Sep 8, 5:32 am, Robatoy snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: >
> > > > I now make parts for different people who e-mail/fax me drawings so I
> > > > can quote on them.
> > > > Some parts are such that I can't tell what they are or what they're
> > > > the purpose of them are.
> > > > Sometimes I see dimensions as obviously imperial ones, sometime it is
> > > > hard to tell, especially when I have NO clue what these parts are.
> > > > Personally, I don't give a rat's ass what system is used as I work in
> > > > both metric and imperial.
> > > > But what seems to be the reason for the US hold-out to stay with an
> > > > archaic system?
>
> > > >formatting link
> > > XXICVIII
>
> > That should have been CCXCVIII, and it's now CCXCIX.
>
> > Why bother changing system?
>
> > L.
>
> CCC. Do you get to buy me a ticket to TO or Windsor or Sarnia & a
> drink in your favourite watering hole?
>
> Luigi
What does it cost to rent a Beaver and a bush pilot to come and fetch you from your cabin?